Day 055 - 25 Nov 94 - Page 75
1
2 MR. JUSTICE BELL: You had a local resident who did not agree at
3 all with the plaudits being aimed at McDonald's King's Road
4 store.
5
6 MR. MORRIS: That is right, Colin McIntyre.
7
8 MR. JUSTICE BELL: That is right. I can see you might not want
9 to call Mr. McIntyre until you have heard Mr. Siddique and
10 Mr. Stump. I understand that, but no other of your
11 witnesses need wait until after Mr. Siddique and Mr. Stump,
12 do they?
13
14 MR. MORRIS: No.
15
16 MR. JUSTICE BELL: That is its own little punch up, is it not?
17
18 MR. MORRIS: It may be, yes. As far as I understood it, the
19 plan as we were given as a proposal was to hear the
20 Plaintiffs' witnesses first on this issue, then to hear our
21 witnesses on this issue, and then move on to a different
22 issue with a break proposed here of two days. We are still
23 trying to finish off Ms. Dibb which is a third issue and
24 I cannot see cramming everything in is going to be the
25 fairest thing to do.
26
27 MR. JUSTICE BELL: I do not think it is being suggested that you
28 cram everything in. If Ms. Dibb had been 4/5ths way
29 through her evidence in-chief I would not have wanted to
30 put her over. Although it might have been very
31 inconvenient to Mr. Mallinson, I would have suggested if
32 Ms. Dibb was available she should come back on Monday to
33 finish her evidence-in-chief. But once we have got on to
34 cross-examination, if anything, it is Mr. Rampton who is
35 being tested by the interruption in cross-examination
36 rather than you. You have Ms. Dibb's out in-chief and now
37 you are just sitting and listening to the cross-examination
38 thinking what you might want to ask in re-examination. So,
39 you are not being inconvenienced by a break in Ms. Dibb's
40 evidence. Since I have heard all her evidence-in-chief
41 I do not feel I am being inconvenienced either.
42
43 MR. MORRIS: We are not complaining about her being put back.
44
45 MR. JUSTICE BELL: When we come to Mr. Siddique and Mr. Stump,
46 you are right that the principle was Mr. Rampton calls all
47 the Plaintiffs' witnesses on recycling and waste, and you
48 call all yours. We have already had to break into that
49 because we had, with my usual ability to forget names, the
50 gentleman from American.
51
52 MR. MORRIS: Mr. Lipsett.
53
54 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Who had the good sense to go on to Paris as
55 soon as he had finished here. You see, we put him in,
56 although he was one of your witnesses. What I am
57 suggesting now is that it would be co-operative and helpful
58 if you accepted that it does not matter if Mr. Siddique and
59 Mr. Stump are called after your witnesses or some of your
60 witnesses, because they are on this discrete issue about
