Day 055 - 25 Nov 94 - Page 72


     
     1
     2   MS. STEEL:  No.  I was going to say that Ms. Dibb cannot come on
     3        Tuesday in any event.  Can I just say, I did want to raise
     4        this, Mr. Rampton has complained sometimes about us reading
     5        out documents just to get them on the record.  It occurred
     6        to me this afternoon that because he did not produce any
     7        reports for when Mr. Miles was giving evidence, he is now
     8        attempting to get them on the record by a kind of back door
     9        route.  I did have concerns about that.
    10
    11   MR. RAMPTON:  No, it is not Ms. Steel's fault, my Lord, she does
    12        not understand the law of evidence.  "Getting them on the
    13        record" is a completely meaningless phrase, so far as
    14        I understand it.  It is convenient because one can see it
    15        on the transcript, but that is all the effect that it has.
    16        It does not mean -- I wish the Defendants would realise
    17        this and then they might stop doing it themselves -- it
    18        does not mean that it is evidence of anything at all except
    19        what the document says.  I do not make those documents
    20        evidence by putting them to Ms. Dibb, except in so far as
    21        she agrees with them.
    22
    23   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  But what you were doing when it came to the
    24        research -- if that is what Ms. Steel had in mind -- was
    25        asking her whether she accepted there was research to that
    26        effect.
    27
    28   MR. RAMPTON:  I am doing two things that I hope are perfectly
    29        apparent now.  I am putting to her and I am saying, as
    30        I said almost at the end there:  "Do you think you read
    31        this when you wrote your report?" I make no secret of the
    32        fact that our proposition about this report is that it is
    33        highly unreliable and misleading, as I think I have already
    34        said.  It is to that end that the cross-examination is
    35        directed.
    36
    37   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Were you concerned about when Mr. Rampton was
    38        asking about the reputable research?
    39
    40   MS. STEEL:  No, I was concerned he was reading out great chunks
    41        of the papers that were not specifically referred to by
    42        her, and in a similar situation, when it has been the other
    43        way round, Mr. Rampton said, well, we should just get the
    44        witness to read it to themselves and then comment on it;
    45        that it is only their comment that matters in any event.
    46
    47   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  That has not been so with scientific papers.
    48
    49   MS. STEEL:  It has been with some things.
    50 
    51   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Where were you stopped reading a scientific 
    52        papers out to a witness? I do not think it has been with 
    53        scientific papers, because the scientific papers are read
    54        out with a view to seeing whether the witness agrees or
    55        otherwise or has any comment on it.  So far as any readings
    56        this afternoon have been concerned, they have really been
    57        because there are references which are quoted by Ms. Dibb
    58        herself in support of statements made in "Children:
    59        Advertisers' Dream".  I know you have a point that it was
    60        not actually Esserman who was actually being quoted in the

Prev Next Index