Day 055 - 25 Nov 94 - Page 40


     
     1
     2        Half of the parents of children over five say they think
     3        that food advertising encourages their children to spend
     4        their pocket money on unsuitable foods.
     5
     6        The conclusion that the NFA has drawn from this is that
     7        parents are firmly united in considering advertising as
     8        having a detrimental effect on children's diets and wanting
     9        to see further restrictions.
    10
    11   MS. STEEL:  Can I just ask about tougher restrictions?  I think
    12        this came up during the cross-examination of Mr. Miles.  In
    13        question 1, do you think it would be necessary for a parent
    14        to know exactly what the restrictions were in order to give
    15        an opinion on that question?
    16        A.  I do not think it would be necessary for them to know
    17        the details of the codes of practice, because they see the
    18        end result, so they know what the end result of that is;
    19        and a sizeable number of them, the majority of them, do not
    20        consider that that is effective enough.
    21
    22   MR. MORRIS:  So it is tougher restrictions, in reality?
    23        A.  Yes.
    24
    25   Q.   If we move on from that, are there any other surveys that
    26        you know of, that we have not mentioned so far, that have
    27        looked into that kind of area?
    28        A.  There is one other survey that I mentioned in
    29        "Children: Advertisers' Dream, Nutrition Nightmare?" which
    30        I refer to ---
    31
    32   Q.   Is there a page?
    33        A.   -- on page 30; and also there is more further
    34        information in the references, reference 167, which is on
    35        page 47 of the report.
    36
    37   Q.   Can you just very briefly -----
    38        A.  This is a reference to a survey that was carried out by
    39        International Communications and Marketing Research, which
    40        was published in the Guardian.  This was looking quite
    41        broadly at issues that had arisen because of the proposed
    42        broadcasting bill.  But one of the questions that was asked
    43        of the 1,460 adults, in January 1990, was their views on
    44        television advertising to children; and this was general;
    45        this was not specific to food; this was all types of
    46        advertising.  That poll found that 61 per cent of those
    47        questioned were opposed to television advertising to
    48        children.
    49
    50   Q.   Have you a copy of that survey? 
    51        A.  I do not have a copy with me now. 
    52 
    53   MR. RAMPTON:  My Lord, I observe that it was not one of the
    54        documents to which Ms. Dibb gave notice she would be
    55        wanting to refer to in evidence.  Therefore, it is not
    56        before your Lordship, and we do not have a copy of it
    57        either.
    58
    59   MR. MORRIS:  Is there a reason why it has not been disclosed?
    60        A.  There was no reason.  I was not, perhaps, prepared---

Prev Next Index