Day 055 - 25 Nov 94 - Page 15


     
     1   Q.   As regards changing the codes and the way the ITC is
     2        structured, and all those kinds of things that you have
     3        mentioned in those recommendations; what was the general
     4        industry position?
     5        A.  The general position was that these changes were not
     6        necessary.
     7
     8   Q.   We can move on from that, then.  There is a great deal of
     9        detail in that pamphlet, but we do not really want to go
    10        into it.  It will save time.
    11
    12        Your pamphlet Responsible Food Advertising, July 1994, this
    13        was issued before the ITC's new proposals; is that correct?
    14        A.  Yes.  This was part of the procedure.  After the
    15        publication of the first report, we held meetings with the
    16        Independent Television Commission and, in the light of the
    17        request of the Health of the Nation to regulatory bodies to
    18        review their codes of practice, the ITC did agree that
    19        there were grounds for looking at the current code.
    20
    21   Q.   So if we could just go to that?
    22        A.  They requested (and it was agreed) that the National
    23        Food Alliance would put together a submission which would
    24        be made and which would be considered together with the
    25        proposals that the ITC, themselves, were then drawing up
    26        for proposals by its Advertising and Advisory Committee.
    27
    28   Q.   The National Food Alliance considered an important part of
    29        the -- I mean, does it represent a coherent camp, in terms
    30        of the proposals to amend the Code?
    31        A.  Yes, I believe it does.  I think that that has been
    32        acknowledged both by the Nutrition Task Force and also, to
    33        some extent, by the ITC.  We do know that the endorsement
    34        by such a broad range of important public health nutrition
    35        orientated bodies is certainly important and influential.
    36
    37   Q.   I believe the NFA is quoted in the "Eat Well" pamphlet?
    38        A.  Yes, it is.
    39
    40   Q.   It is also referred to in the letter sent out by the ITC
    41        with their proposals.  I do not know if it is referred to
    42        by name.  We will come to that maybe a bit later on.
    43        A.  Yes.
    44
    45   Q.   So your proposals -----
    46        A.  The proposals.
    47
    48   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Where are you now, because you are waving a
    49        pink book around, without telling me where to find it.
    50 
    51   MS. STEEL:  It should be behind Ms. Dibb's statement. 
    52 
    53   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Yes.  I have a mass of stuff behind
    54        Ms. Dibb's statement.  Can you not steer me towards where
    55        it is?  What does it have written on the front of it?
    56
    57   MR. MORRIS:  It is Responsible Food Advertising.  There is a
    58        copy here with some highlighting on it.
    59
    60   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  You think I have copy of this, do you?  I may

Prev Next Index