Day 049 - 09 Nov 94 - Page 25
1 (The Short Adjournment)
2
3 2 p.m.
4
5
6 MR. RAMPTON: I am afraid we have a problem with the machine,
7 rather with the tape. I do not know if Mr. Styles has told
8 you. It will not seem to play. When I saw it for the
9 first time this morning in chambers, it worked perfectly
10 all right on the little television we have got there.
11 Mr. Hill has gone back to chambers to see if it will work
12 again. That might take a few minutes more.
13
14 There are some questions I can ask Ms. Gallatley, not
15 arising out of the tape, obviously, but in relation to
16 other matters, but I am not sure if that is particularly
17 good use of your Lordship's time.
18
19 There are some quite pertinent questions I wish to ask
20 arising out of that tape, but they will not make any sense
21 until your Lordship has seen it. Your Lordship may think
22 it is right to adjourn for half an hour, or so?
23
24 MR. JUSTICE BELL: That seems the most sensible. How long do
25 you anticipate your cross-examination might be, apart from
26 questions on the tape?
27
28 MR. RAMPTON: About another 20 minutes.
29
30 MS. STEEL: Obviously, we did not know this was coming up until
31 today and we have not seen the video. We wanted to ask
32 whether we can speak to the witness after the video has
33 been shown?
34
35 MR. JUSTICE BELL: What I suggest is what Mr. Rampton has, in
36 fact, suggested. I will go back to my room, and I will
37 just wait there, unless the delay is very, very long. We
38 have an expectation of seeing the video and having your
39 cross-examination for the rest of the afternoon.
40
41 MR. RAMPTON: There is no question about that. As to what
42 Ms. Steel has just said, I am rather doubtful about that.
43 It does seem to me that this is a videotape which, until
44 this morning, we did not know was what it appears to be.
45 It is mentioned in Ms. Gallatley's statement, and I am
46 somewhat surprised that the Defendants have not had the
47 initiative to request a copy of the video and to disclose
48 it.
49
50 MS. STEEL: It is not mentioned in her statement, specifically,
51 and it is not relevant to the area she was giving evidence
52 on. She was giving evidence on the views expressed by
53 children, not about what The Vegetarian Society does.
54
55 MR. JUSTICE BELL: It might or might not have been relevant, and
56 had you been counsel or your solicitor, you might have
57 thought of saying, "We had better see the video." But
58 however that may be, in the circumstances of this case, I
59 see no harm in having a short adjournment, which is all
60 that it should require, and, at the end of your