Day 048 - 08 Nov 94 - Page 25


     
     1        10 second commercial to a 20 second, to a 60 second, and
     2        they come up with a 30 second equivalent.  I am not certain
     3        how they do that.
     4
     5   Q.   Can you explain -- just take one column and explain what
     6        the figures mean?
     7        A.  Well, I will do as much as I can, but I am not a media
     8        expert.  Which page are you on?
     9
    10   MR. JUSTICE BELL: Take page 245, and take any----
    11        A.  The one at the top left?
    12
    13   Q.   Yes.  Take January.
    14        A.  We had an activity which was Submarine, which was the
    15        submarine commercial that we saw.  The length of that
    16        commercial was 30 seconds.  There were, it would seem,
    17        432 gross rating points; and it says 30 second equivalent,
    18        620.  I do not know how they achieved that.  The universe,
    19        I am assuming, is 514,000 of our target audience.  The
    20        30 second cost per thousand was £908.
    21
    22   MS. STEEL:  Is it cost per thousand----
    23        A.  I believe it is, yes.
    24
    25   Q.   ----viewers?
    26        A.  Yes, I believe it is.  We need to check these, but this
    27        is just my understanding of it, without going into these
    28        numbers in detail.  The coverage was: 70 percent of the
    29        target audience had a chance to see the commercial
    30        6.2 times; and if you multiplied 6.2 by 70, you should get
    31        something close to the 432.  I do not know if that works
    32        out or not.  The spend was £19,696.  That is my
    33        understanding of this document.
    34
    35   Q.   So if 70 percent had the opportunity to see the advert
    36        6.2 times, that must mean that the advert was shown more
    37        than 6.2 times in that period?
    38        A.  I do not know.
    39
    40   Q.   Well, it must do; they could not have seen it more times
    41        than it was shown?
    42        A.  No.  It is to do with the percentage of the audience
    43        here.  It is possible that, in terms of coverage, that some
    44        of the audience only actually saw it once and others may
    45        have seen it ten times.
    46
    47   Q.   That is what I am saying.
    48        A.  There is an average opportunity.
    49
    50   Q.   What I am saying is that the ad must have been shown more 
    51        than -- well, you cannot show it 6.2 times, anyway; it must 
    52        have been shown more than 6.2 times? 
    53        A.  Yes, but I cannot, from these figures, tell you
    54        anything about the numbers of spots.
    55
    56   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  No.  You are not being asked to say how many
    57        times, just it must have been more than 6.2 times, or you
    58        could not have an average of 6.2.  If you are going to have
    59        an average of 6.2, some, for instance, may have seen it ten
    60        times and others twice or not at all, which would mean that

Prev Next Index