Day 044 - 02 Nov 94 - Page 46
1 the context of what McDonald's is all about. But,
2 ultimately, it is distributed not only for an educational
3 purpose, but also to enhance the perception that the
4 company has on the part of parents and children; and
5 I would agree with that.
6
7 Q. There is no reason, is there, though, to have
8 ronald mcdonald in that book? It does not help the
9 rainforests, does it?
10 A. I think the reason is that it came from McDonald's, and
11 therefore-----
12
13 Q. You said -- or somebody said -- that the editorial control
14 was from Conservation International?
15 A. That is correct.
16
17 Q. So it did not need ronald mcdonald in it, did it? It does
18 not help the rainforests one bit, does it?
19 A. I think that if the message gets out significantly
20 greater than it might have gotten out otherwise, it does
21 help, yes.
22
23 Q. Is one of the messages that get outs that McDonald's cares
24 about the rainforests?
25 A. Certainly, that is one; also, McDonald's cares about
26 certain educational projects and that the information
27 inside the booklet has a wide form.
28
29 MR. JUSTICE BELL: There was an article in one of our national
30 newspapers today which sought to make the point (among
31 others) that investors, employees and customers are no
32 longer just interested in the financial return -- or a
33 growing proportion of them -- or the product, but in the
34 soul of the corporation and its ethical stand. Is that a
35 fact of life nowadays and something which your promotional
36 material takes account of?
37 A. Yes. If the promotion material can have a pro-social
38 aspect to it and, essentially, communicate the same kinds
39 of standards and feelings that the company has, that is not
40 only important for the consumer but it is also important
41 for the investors and the stockholders, as well.
42
43 MR. MORRIS: Maybe we can leave that document. Just one aside,
44 really, while I have it in front of me. I think it has
45 been admitted.
46
47 There was a survey carried out by McDonald's Headquarters
48 in the USA in the 1970s that found out that in three out of
49 four families it was the children who decided where to
50 eat. Do you recall that?
51 A. No.
52
53 Q. I think it has been admitted. You do not have any
54 recollection of it, yourself?
55 A. No. The numbers that I recall -- which are maybe more
56 recent numbers -- is that the decision or the influence
57 decision of the child is in approximately 40 to 50 per cent
58 of the cases.
59
60 MR. MORRIS: Maybe it is a good time to ask about the specific