Day 040 - 21 Oct 94 - Page 35
1 MR. RAMPTON: Professor Walker told us about it.
2
3 MR. JUSTICE BELL: In fact, it was someone in Professor Walker's
4 own town; a young woman or girl who ate a meringue.
5 A. I think that event has triggered some further
6 research. That is my understanding.
7
8 MR. RAMPTON: If it be right that peanuts, for example, and
9 perhaps wheat in some its forms with some people ---
10
11 MR. JUSTICE BELL: Syriac disease.
12
13 MR. RAMPTON: -- can produce life-threatening conditions and,
14 indeed, can cause death as in the case of that young girl.
15 What do you propose should be done to protect those members
16 of the public who are susceptible to that kind of
17 life-threatening allergy?
18 A. Well, I certainly would not recommend banning the
19 peanut, and labelling obviously has a vital role to play.
20 I do, however, want to make a very sharp distinction
21 between additives and foods. Peanuts are a nutritious
22 food. They provide proteins and other nutrients and, in
23 that respect, are desirable for very large sections of the
24 population.
25
26 By contrast, food additives, particularly things like
27 synthetic colours or bulking agents, like Carrageenan, have
28 no nutritional benefit whatsoever. Therefore, I would
29 judge food additives by very different standards from those
30 which I think should apply to nutrient foods.
31
32 Q. Nobody needs to eat peanuts, Dr. Millstone, do they?
33 A. Nobody needs to eat peanuts, but when people eat
34 peanuts typically the peanuts nourish people.
35
36 Q. There are plenty of alternatives?
37 A. There are plenty of alternatives. Vegetarian and
38 vegans, on the other hand, have a much narrower range of
39 alternatives, especially for protein sources than do many
40 other people, but I can see no good case for banning
41 peanuts; whereas I can see considerable stronger cases for
42 banning or tightly restricting some food additives.
43
44 MR. JUSTICE BELL: You draw that distinction. Do you draw a
45 distinction between additives used to make the presentation
46 of food more attractive and additives used for potential
47 safety reasons?
48 A. I most certainly do. As I think I indicated in
49 response to a previous question, when juxtaposing risks and
50 benefits, one makes a different assessment of a
51 preservative which inhibits the development of bacteria
52 which could cause bacterial food poisoning from an additive
53 such as a synthetic colour which has no direct benefit to
54 human health.
55
56 MR. RAMPTON: Dr. Millstone, what should we do with those,
57 leaving aside the validity of your proposition entirely, if
58 I may, what should we do about those additives which, in
59 your view, do serve a useful purpose in stopping us from
60 getting salmonella or botulism or it might be E. coli or