Day 025 - 16 Sep 94 - Page 05


     
     1        their statement that they lowered the sodium in pickles.
     2        As I testified yesterday, logically that would tell me
     3        that sodium in the burgers should have been lowered but,
     4        according to their data, it was not.  So the fact they
     5        lowered the sodium in the pickle would be even more
     6        irrelevant.
     7
     8   MS. STEEL:   If we could turn to document 32, it is in the
     9        smaller bundle, volume VI A?
    10        A.  I have it.
    11
    12   Q.   If we go to page 94, there was some dispute about what
    13        sodium hexametaphosphate was yesterday.  Looking at the
    14        definition here, which is that it is used to help prevent
    15        moisture loss and rancidity, do you think it would be fair
    16        to call it a preservative, or it could be called a
    17        preservative?
    18        A.  I think it should be called a "preservative".  Again,
    19        as I said yesterday, it is possible that there is an
    20        arcane definition in the distinction between stabilizer
    21        and preservative within the chemical chemistry, or some
    22        such, but looking (as I must) at the advertisement from a
    23        consumer prospective, any artificial chemical that is
    24        added to a product to prevent it from spoiling seems to me
    25        to be a preservative and not a stabilizer.
    26
    27        I do from that also conclude not what it seems to me that
    28        the consumers are going to believe that as well.  It is a
    29        distinction that to consumers has no difference
    30        whatsoever.  The important point here is whether it is
    31        artificial, whether it is a chemical, and gamesmanship and
    32        wordplay between whether it is an artificial chemical
    33        stabilizer versus an artificial chemical preservative is
    34        of no meaning whatsoever to consumers who wish to avoid
    35        artificial chemicals in their products.
    36
    37   MR. JUSTICE BELL:  Did you say "should be" called or "could be"
    38        called a preservative?
    39        A.  I said I believe, your Lordship, should be called, as
    40        far as what would be clear to the average American
    41        consumer.  I suspect that one could say that anything that
    42        prevents something from going bad also stabilizes it.  But
    43        I think it is more a common sense definition, which is
    44        what we look at for what consumers read to call it a
    45        preservative; it preserves it and keeps it from going bad.
    46
    47   MS. STEEL:   OK.  Yesterday when we were looking at the
    48        "Leaner" ad, which is the last couple of pages just
    49        before Exhibit 8?
    50        A.  I have it. 
    51 
    52   Q.   I think you said that you had worked out the figures and 
    53        that it worked out that a regular hamburger was, in fact,
    54        deriving about 60 per cent of its calories from fat.  Was
    55        that what you were intending to say?
    56        A.  No.  I do recall that I said that.  I was referring to
    57        the McDLT, which is also included in that ad; that the
    58        McDLT does have nearly 60 per cent.  I think it is exactly
    59        58.2, and some odd decimals after that, per cent calories
    60        from fat.

Prev Next Index