Day 016 - 22 Jul 94 - Page 32
1 MS. STEEL: I am going to move on to additives: I am not going
to go into massive detail because you said you are
2 deferring to, is it, Professor Walker, I think?
A. Yes.
3
Q. Leaving it up to him, but as you have it in your statement
4 we do need to deal with it a little. Can you just tell us
the classification system for additives?
5 A. I would need to refer to my notes for that. It is not
the kind of information I carry around in my head.
6
Q. I think it is page 61. It starts on page 61. Have you
7 found it?
A. Yes.
8
Q. The number at the bottom?
9 A. Page 61, yes.
10 Q. Can you run through what the classification system is?
A. Whereabouts are you referring to on this page?
11
Q. I think it starts at the bottom.
12 A. The system determined by the UK. This is for
regulatory control. I think this is a little bit out of
13 date now, but certainly when I was writing this my
understanding was that this was the way in which the
14 Committee on Toxicology in this country would classify the
different groups of additives, but the two that would have
15 been reliable were "substances that the available evidence
suggests are accepted for use in food and substances on
16 the available evidence may be regarded as provisionally
accepted for use in food, on which further information is
17 required". So all the ones that are allowed -- what ones
there would be no reservations about and others would be
18 allowed, but they would be kept under review and the
manufacturers would be expected to provide additional
19 information.
20 Q. Sorry. I am not sure whether -- so the ones under
category C and D are sometimes allowed?
21 A. No.
22 Q. They are not?
A. Not in my understanding.
23
Q. Does it not say "ought not to be permitted"?
24 A. Yes, well, one will interpret that as a recommendation
to the regulatory authorities.
25
Q. Right.
26
MR. JUSTICE BELL: That would apply to D as well?
27 A. Yes.
28 Q. The same phraseology is used there.
29 MS. STEEL: It does not mean they sometimes are permitted?
A. No. It is only the ones that go into A and B that
30 would be allowed. I should also point out in relation to
the development of this type of legislation, the