Day 002 - 29 Jun 94 - Page 22
1 ruling on this matter in open court when people come back
into court, because it is clearly important that as much
2 of this trial, now we are hearing in open court, including
interlocutory matters, be heard in open court.
3
MR. RAMPTON: I was not dealing with any application for
4 discovery that might now be made. It would not be an
appropriate moment for Mr. Morris to make it anyway.
5
MR. MORRIS: I was not making an application.
6
MR. RAMPTON: I was dealing with the general problem that Miss
7 Steel and Mr. Morris have on frequent occasions quite
falsely asserted for public consumption that McDonald's
8 have failed in their obligation for discovery. It is not
so. Your Lordship knows it is not so. The process of
9 discovery is governed by the court; McDonald's has
complied as best it can with every single order for
10 discovery that has been made against it; numerous
applications for discovery have been made which have
11 failed on the ground of irrelevance. I should wish it to
be known publicly how false that allegation is.
12
MR. JUSTICE BELL: I have.
13
MR. RAMPTON: They have also said that we refused to give
14 particulars of the counterclaim. Again another false
allegation. The request is served; it is being dealt
15 with.
16 MISS STEEL: Perhaps Mr. Morris should have said "failed to
give particulars" rather than "refused", but the
17 substantial allegation is still true.
18 MR. RAMPTON: "Have not yet given the particulars" would be the
accurate way of putting it.
19
MR. JUSTICE BELL: The appropriate time, it seems to me, for
20 you to make any comment -- I certainly cannot stop you,
Mr. Rampton -- is when Miss Steel and Mr. Morris have
21 completed all they wished to say in opening. I certainly
do not think it desirable -- I do not think you had it in
22 mind to make any comment in open court while they are
opening?
23
MR. RAMPTON: No. That is why I raised it now. With your
24 Lordship's leave, I will say something when they are
finished but that is quite apart from the question of
25 appropriateness or proprietary of showing that film at
this stage in the case.
26
MR. JUSTICE BELL: That is entirely a matter for you as counsel
27 on behalf of McDonald's to take whichever course you wish
to take.
28
MR. RAMPTON: My Lord, I have said this, so long as it is made
29 clear that it is only shown because it is said by the
defendants to be relevant to their state of mind, not as
30 evidence of the truth of what is said in it. I could not
reasonably object, otherwise I would.