In Reply to: Why attack McDonalds posted by Elizabeth Chamberlain on November 29, 1996 at 18:43:05:
> The question is not Why, but WHY NOT?> Freedom of speach. That's why not.
Surely freedom of speech gives us the right to challenge the ethics
of such an organisation in any way we see fit.I think that McDonalds are already regretting the UK court action
and the publicity it has brought them.
None.