- Capitalism and Alternatives -

And how would a Randean analysis fit into all of this?

Posted by: Dr. Cruel on July 12, 1999 at 10:14:38:

In Reply to: Gibson, Habermas and the neocapitalist paradigm posted by Jean Claude on July 09, 1999 at 12:35:56:

Your greatest difficulty, in attempting to make any of this convoluted argument hold, is that reality has completely diverged from the modern post-modern metaphysical uber-paradigm, which according to this narrative has scampered off on a tangent into Carrollean absurdity. As in Lewis.

And how would a Randean analysis fit into all of this? Given the present state of affairs in the vaunted halls of academia philosophia, do you think that there is any hope for these wayward souls to approach even the most trivial understanding available to the man-on-the-street?

Sartrean absurdity indeed. All this existential angst gives me gas. Bah.


Follow Ups:

None.

The Debating Room Post a Followup