: As counter I would offer the law of identity and ask "does mankind have a specific non contradictory nature?". In other words I can accept that one tribe is violent and the other not and this be ascribed to 'socialisation', but that does not mean that *any* socialisation can produce results according to inputs. That mans nature, however ill defined, is the cause of this behaviour which is deemed socialisation and which has this very pervasive influence on people as individual entities.
SDF: This argument is completely unsupported by any citation of actual societies as recorded in the anthropological record.
None.
