- Capitalism and Alternatives -

Bit emotive, doesnt further your argument.

Posted by: Lark ( NA, USRE ) on March 01, 1999 at 14:53:06:

In Reply to: logical fallacy of emotion posted by Joel Jacobson on February 27, 1999 at 01:52:49:

: Yes, several people here have directly said "no compromise". You, then, may be the exception.

No Compromise the only way to live.

:everyone's going to die if they don't follow some shining path.

Sounds like the entire capitalist debate, if you dont follow us, property will be threatened, the individual will be threatened etc.

:Pointing out that 'no compromise' usually means no pragmatic/practical action is definitely not any such appeal.

Yes, we're pragmatic then state's marginally good if it redistributes wealth but it's not as good as an old revolution. It's about expanding the floor of the cage until you can break the bars.

:Again, please, figure out what the hell you're talking about before you post.

Bit emotive, doesnt further your argument.


Follow Ups:

The Debating Room Post a Followup