: Repeat: Iam NOT for the ststus quo, I am for a purer capitalism. : Becouse the status quo is suported by the government we now have its impossible to change anything without further legeslation.
: Its my opinion that anti-trus litigation against unions early this century was unfounded anyways (so far as the unions keep public records), and just a stalling card played by those resistent to entering the capitalism we now know.
Yes, I was going to mention WWII debt incured becouse many economist, conservative and librel, beleave some debt (and spending) is good for security savings and the market.
: I do know there is much firvoulious government spending (one could not spend 2 minutes in this debating room without hearing of the horrors of corparate welfare.) This too would have to be delt with government action, but after that the capitalism would be entirely self contained, and separate from the government. In my opinion the marshall plan played a minor part in war recovery. Germany and Japan, with established capital and financial instituions (not to mention lack of military spending), would have quickly rebounded anyway.
These are prime examples of how the world can benifit from fierce "consumerism".
None.
