- Capitalism and Alternatives -

Of course I include all that as work.

In Reply to: Can you go along with that? posted by Henry on January 21, 19100 at 15:30:14:

: As long as you can acknowledge that the rich and super-rich don't have to do any work, then we can move on. What this does, though, is focus the debate on property, not working to succeed or laziness or any such notion. Can you go along with that?

It focus' the debate on property if your definition of work doesn't include intellectual work, entrepreneurial work, creative rearranging present modes of production and the rewards attached to those activities.
Of course I include all that as work. The rewards that naturally follow, ie; wealth and property and prestige etc, are the consumers way of saying 'Thanx'.

Follow Ups:

• Do You Include 'Inheritance' as 'Work' Too? Krasny Internationale All Countries... January 23 19100 (4)
  • It's yours, do with it as you wish. Frenchy January 24 19100 (3)
    • The Concept of 'Hard Work' Krasny Internationale All Countries... January 25 19100 (2)
      • The hard work of theorizing. Frenchy January 26 19100 (1)
        • Frenchy: Quite Easily a Dimwit Krasny Internationale All Countries... January 27 19100 (0)
• Frenchy is like Humpty Dumpty, who insisted a word meant what he wanted it to mean. Pete January 23 19100 (1)
  • And all the Kings men couldn't put the Queen back together again. Frenchy January 24 19100 (0)
• People, many of whom don't even own computers, are saying 'thanx' to Bill Gates? Henry January 23 19100 (0)