: I've just read that link and it's definitely not you on form at all.It wouldn't be would it - I didn't write it! Its just the first star trek comment that seemed relavent to your analogy. You must admit the point on militarism was good.
: That page appears to me to be one of those two bit anti-socialist pages that is happy to re-write political spectrum etc. so that socialism is synominous with facism etc. now I thought we where all mature enough to have gotten by this by now and debate.
No the definitions are all clear - I think you can seperate what you call socialism (which Barry, when generous, calls anarchism) from the lenin-marx representation you yourself criticise. thats all.
: The criticism of the none existance of money etc. is shocking, I no that this guy is possibly very commited to an ideology but would I not be right in saying that capitalists every now and then wish people could be more generous with each other, less selfish and inconsiderate and develope a life unregulated by their employers?
Why does criticising a TV programme for selling a scenario without explaining how it works mean that the author must lack benevolence?
Perhaps it needs re-reading, I don't find it so shocking.
