: : How subtle that was!: Not only was it not subtle - it was not the same as calling you fascist...
You said:
What you champion is some kind of 'super party' which you consider necessary to get those (by implication hapless) proletariats' act together. Not only is it not necessary its also liable to be false leader-following reminiscent of Hitler's 'for the poeple' strategy.
That is the cheapest sort of smear ever. The LOWEST.
All I have ever championed is a revolutionary party ready to lead a MAJORITY of working people WHEN they are willing to institute socialism.
If you think that successful revolutions occur WITHOUT a leading party to organize the activity of the people, you disregard ALL history.
BTW, Hitler (as you'll recall) was ELECTED in a bourgeois country.