- Capitalism and Alternatives -

No thanks!

In Reply to: No thanks? posted by Gee on October 29, 1999 at 12:57:15:

: : It's disappointing---and frustrating---that you simply will not admit what is obvious to anyone who has read Capital: you haven't read it.

: It's disappointing---and frustrating---that you simply can not conceive that anyone could so much as turn the first page of 'capital' without being cleansed of 'heresy' and be from that day forth be a convert.

In this post, you say 'profit is gain based upon use-value' AND 'Machinery is variable capital.'

THAT'S the proof that you haven't read ANY of Capital.

• Everest

Follow Ups:

None.