|  
 - Anything Else - Deconstructing Squares.Posted by: MDG  on February 16, 19100 at 10:19:18:
In Reply to: Right here, next to my heart. posted by Farinata on February 15, 19100 at 18:40:20: 
  
 : There could be a five-sided square. I've never seen one; and according to my understanding they don't exist; but I'm not the ultimate authority. Sorry, Stuart, I thought I'd made myself pretty clear there.: I can never say 'there are no five-sided squares' without invoking synthetic a priori assumptions or definitions (i.e. what the definition of a 'square' is.) Good grief Farinata, sometimes I think you scientists deconstruct too much for your own good!   What is the definition of a square?  A rectangle with all four sides equal.  Who created this definition?  People did!  There can be no five-sided squares yet undiscovered because by man-made definition they would no longer be squares!  Could there be semolina spaghetti made from spam?  Could there be a toaster which makes bread soggy, not crisp?  Allow humanity the luxury of defining things and abiding by those definitions; it's one thing to be a skeptic, but quite another to be a naysayer for the sake of naying itself. ("Naying." (v) To say nay).
 
 
  
Follow Ups: 
 
 |