: : But you haven't disproved Genesis. You've overlooked the fact that someone may pick out the currents.: Because this is unprovable one way or the other. I'm arguing physical processes; and you cannot cite physical processes as logical proof of the alogical, non-physical and unprovable; either you believe or you don't.
: For what it's worth, as Floyd points out, Genesis contradicts itself. And since it is unfalsfiable, it isn't a matter of science; it's a matter of faith; and thus Genesis cannot be used to provide "proof" of anything; because proof is a logical concept, not a matter of faith.
: The challenge still stands; and you're back to Square 1.
Yes, Floyd "pointed out" that Genesis 2 contradicts Genesis 1. But he didn't say how. I've had others before say that the Bible contradicts itself, but I've never found or come across a contradiction which remains a contradiction when studied out. You're apparent contradictions don't actually exist.
