: : When did I say that? Read the above post again Mr.: You said Nazi-ism was illegitimate for its *internationalism*, since teh BNP are not expansionist, and are isolationist....
Yeah that's why if you check out Spotlight that they're so pally with the KKK, the Scottish KKK, the Irish Social Action Initiative, the Ulster Loyalists, the Danish Flemish nationalists, the National socialists in Holland and Le Pen.
To the extent that Combat 18 since it's many internal purges is now full of german and french "secuirity personnel" to protect the BNP/C18 leaders.
: : Well no, not really, that would be Chauvinism (Say it with me now).
: Why is having an attachment to my ideniity as white (well, grey any different from the identity I build as british? Can't I have a pluralist, sentimental pride in my skin colour? Why must it be chauvanist.
I just think it is that's all, your colour is not conducive of anything I mean people dont achieve things because they are white or black or whatever. Similarly I would deny that anyone achieves things because they are of a particular nation.
: : One is definitely Chauvinistic designed for the purposes of egotism alone, one can be perfectly anti-chauvinistic, a partner to internationalism and legitimate.
: Why is racism always chauvantist, can't I just be looking out for my fellows in blood? Can't I internationally pursue allegiance with my fellows in blood.
You can if you want, you'd be a nazi though wouldn't you and do you want that?
: : I hope I dont have to spell it out.
: Yes, you do, I see no logic in the above. Your argument seems to stand on 'its different, because it is.'
Right here's the logic you get black, white, red, yellow Americans, that identity isnt exclusive, race is.
