McDONALD'S WRIT OF SUMMONS |
SUIT NO. C.L. 1995/M-440 |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA
IN COMMON LAW
BETWEEN: |
McDONALD'S CORPORATION
PLAINTIFF
A N D
McDONALD'S CORPORATION LIMITED
1ST DEFENDANT
VINCENT CHANG
2ND DEFENDANT |
ELIZABETH II by the Grace of God of Jamaica and of Her Other Realms and Territories
Queen Head of the Commonwealth.
TO:
McDONALD'S CORPORATION LIMITED
25A Half Way Tree Road
Kingston 5
TO:
VINCENT CHANG
49 Norbrook Drive
Kingston 8
We command you that within fourteen days from the service of this Writ upon you, exclusive of the
day of such service, you do cause an appearance to be entered for you in an action at the suit of,
McDONALD'S CORPORATION of 1 McDonald Plaza, Oak Brook, Illinois 60521 and take notice
that in default of your so doing the Plaintiff may proceed therein and judgment may be given in your
absence.
Witness the Honourable Edward Zacca, O.J. Chief Justice of Jamaica, the day of October
in the year of Our Lord One Thousand Nine Hundred and Ninety Five .
N.B. This Writ is to be served within twelve calendar months from the date thereof or if renewed six calendar months from the date of the last renewal, including the day of such date and not afterwards.
The Defendant may appear hereto by entering an appearance, either personally or by Attorney-at-Law at the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court in Kingston.
| |
ENDORSEMENT
THE PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS IS FOR:
-
1. An injunction to restrain the Defendants whether by themselves, or by their directors, officers,
servants or agents or any of them, or otherwise howsoever from doing any act to infringe the
Plaintiffs registered trade marks nos. B21019, B17398, B16214, B17849 or any of them and
being the Plaintiff's corporate logo.
2. An injunction to restrain the Defendants whether by themselves or by their directors, officers,
servants or agents, or any of them, or otherwise howsoever from passing off or attempting
to pass off the Defendants' restaurant business at 1 Cargill Avenue, Kingston 10 in the Parish
of Saint Andrew or any other restaurant as and for the business of the Plaintiff by the use in
connection therewith of the name or trading style "McDonald's" or "McDonald's Corporation"
or "McD" or any name or trading style containing the word "McDonald's" or any colourable
imitation thereof.
- 3. An injunction to restrain the Defendant, whether by themselves or by their directors, officers,
servants or agents or any of them or otherwise howsoever, from using the name or trading
style "McDonald's" or "McDonald's Corporation" or "McD" or any colourable imitation
thereof and so thereby representing to the public in a false and misleading respect that the
Defendants' restaurant business at 1 Cargill Avenue, Kingston 10 in the Parish of Saint
Andrew or any other restaurant is connected to or associated with the Plaintiff in breach of
the provisions of the Fair Competition Act.
4. An injunction restraining the Defendants whether by themselves, their officers, directors,
servants, agents or any of them, or otherwise howsoever from carrying on a restaurant
business at 1 Cargill Avenue, Kingston 10 in the Parish of Saint Andrew or any other
restaurant under the name or style "McDonald's " or "McDonald's Corporation" or "McD"
or any name or style which includes the words McDonald's or which so nearly resembles the
same or any colourable imitation thereof.
-
5. Obliteration upon oath of all marks upon all signs, banners, advertising material or other
articles which bears the name, mark or style "McDonald's" or "McDonald's Corporation" or
"McD" or which would be a breach of the aforesaid injunctions prayed for and verification
upon oath by the Defendants that they no longer have in their possession custody or control
any sign advertising material or other article so marked.
6. An enquiry as to damages and payment of all sums found due upon the taking of such an
enquiry.
-
7. Further or other relief as the Court may deem fit.
8. Costs.
|
| LIVINGSTON, ALEXANDER & LEVY, Attorneys-at-Law |
At: | No. 72 Harbour Street, Kingston |
Attorneys-at-Law for the said Plaintiff |
Filed by:
This WRIT was issued by LIVINGSTON, ALEXANDER & LEVY,
Attorneys-at-Law
|