Day 249 - 14 May 96 - Page 23


     
     1   Q.   You had responsibility for liaising with the solicitors?
     2        A.  Yes, it remained very much in my pocket.
     3
     4   Q.   But despite that, you did not attend the pickets?
     5        A.  No.
     6
     7   Q.   This mistake that you say was in your statement when the
     8        proof of evidence was taken, did you not give any details
     9        before that?
    10        A.  Yes, I was interviewed by Mrs. Brinley-Codd, I believe
    11        the day following the '89 demonstrations, and that is when
    12        I handed her the copy of the pamphlet I had been given and,
    13        I mean, we discussed what had taken place, we discussed
    14        what I had seen but there was no prove of evidence taken.
    15        We had not...  We had issued writ...
    16        No, no, sorry.  I am getting the years mixed up. '89 we had
    17        not any notion then of going to court, we were starting, or
    18        we were mounting, an observation on your group, but
    19        acquiring evidence, building up evidence, had not even
    20        entered our minds at that time.
    21
    22   Q.   So although you discussed the matter with Mrs Brinley-Codd
    23        and gave her the leaflets, you did not go into great detail
    24        about what went on, or anything like that, in 1989?
    25        A.  I would tell her what I had done and what I had seen.
    26
    27   Q.   And how was it, in that case, that when the proof was done
    28        in 1990 this part was got wrong?
    29        A.  Well, the only explanation I can offer is that I had
    30        said 'for the past 3 years', and it had been 1991 and we
    31        were about '87, it went back '87, there were certainly no
    32        demonstrations to my knowledge in '86 or '85.
    33
    34   Q.   There was no demonstration in '87 or '88 was there either?
    35        A.  Yes, '87 was the first one.  I attended that one.  It
    36        was advertised 4 till 6, I believe.  I got there at about
    37        quarter to 4 along with an inspector, a sergeant and 6
    38        constables, and until 4 o'clock we were the only people
    39        there.  The next thing I noticed was a young lad standing
    40        fairly closely to me with a haversack on his back and
    41        sticking out of the top of the haversack were 3 highly
    42        coloured Indian clubs.
    43
    44   Q.   This is 1987?
    45        A.  '87.
    46
    47   Q.   In '87?
    48        A.  Yes.
    49
    50   Q.   Not '89? 
    51        A.  No, not '89. 
    52 
    53   Q.   There was juggling in '87 as well?
    54        A.  There was juggling in '87.  He stood round for a while
    55        and then he walked away, and then over about the next 15
    56        minutes it was half a dozen people, some of them carrying
    57        placards, assembled and sat on the wall and then the chap
    58        with the clubs came back.  He took his jacket off, he had a
    59        highly coloured shirt on.  I think he put a hat on, and he
    60        began a juggling act.  I think on that occasion I put the

Prev Next Index