Day 249 - 14 May 96 - Page 22
1 1?
2 A. Yes.
3
4 Q. Is that the first statement that you made for this case
5 about the publication side of things?
6 A. The first statement, the first of the two statements,
7 yes.
8
9 Q. Yes?
10 A. Yes.
11
12 Q. It is right. You said that the proof of that was taken by
13 Mrs. Brinley-Codd in 1990?
14 A. Yes.
15
16 Q. And that at that time you had seen 3 protests outside the
17 Head Office?
18 A. Well, I attended throughout in '87, because that was
19 the first one.
20
21 Q. Right.
22 A. I paid casual visits in '88. I paid the 3 visits, plus
23 driving past in '89. I paid casual visits in '90, I think
24 only twice, and I was not there in '91, '92.
25
26 Q. You did not go to any of the other ones?
27 A. I was not at work, I was sick in '91 and sick in '92.
28
29 Q. What about '93, '94 and '95?
30 A. No.
31
32 Q. You did not go to any of them?
33 A. No, I was not really involved in security that time.
34 I had taken up the role of ombudsman and that, I mean, that
35 was just the security of the building, it did not affect me
36 at all. I may have walked out on one or two occasions.
37 I cannot remember having done so. I may have done out of
38 just interest, but I did not attend for any purpose.
39
40 Q. You were still Vice President with responsibilities for the
41 security were you not?
42 A. When?
43
44 Q. By '93, '94, '95?
45 A. No.
46
47 Q. No?
48 A. No, I had been appointed ombudsman. There had been a
49 reshake of the hierarchy of the structure within the
50 department, within the Company. Security went to Marcus
51 Hewson, personnel went to Andy Taylor and franchising went
52 to Marcus Hewson. I had been a long time sick and they had
53 appointed Vice Presidents to look after the departments in
54 my absence, and when I came back I was offered the post of
55 ombudsman and those departments were reallocated.
56
57 Q. But you still had an interest in the case?
58 A. I had an interest in this case, I was still fighting
59 it.
60