Day 244 - 03 May 96 - Page 17


     
     1        McDonald's, the Home Grown Wheat Authority (op cit) has
     2        reported that pesticide residues can 'bind' to substances
     3        like potatoes and flour and, in that state, cannot be
     4        readily detected.  Therefore, finding as to residues in
     5        these products were likely to have been under-stated.
     6
     7        Additionally, it should be recognised that sampling was
     8        confined to a limited number of pesticide.  Out of 400
     9        pesticides cleared for use, only 20 were tested routinely.
    10        Thus, testing was not carried out for 95 per cent of
    11        permitted pesticides.  It would defy logic to assume that
    12        only tested products left residues so, again, it is likely
    13        that the figures for pesticide residues are under-stated on
    14        this account.
    15
    16        From my own personal knowledge of the meat industry" -- can
    17        I ask you a question there:  The residue limits that the
    18        MAFF set, have they changed since this case started, do you
    19        know?
    20        A.  To my recollection on some products, yes.
    21
    22   Q.   Right:
    23
    24        "From my own personal knowledge of the meat industry and
    25        the conduct of routine" -- when you say they have changed,
    26        do you mean they go up or go down as a minimum allowable
    27        residue limit?
    28        A.  You are talking about a very wide range:  Some go up,
    29        some go down.  I remember the carrots last year.  As a
    30        result of findings, they were lowered and generally the
    31        drift is downwards.  It is relatively rare to see permitted
    32        residue levels go up.
    33
    34   Q.   Going back to reading the statement:
    35
    36        "From my own personal knowledge of the meat industry and
    37        the conduct of routine pesticide residue surveyors - and my
    38        knowledge of the behaviour of OP pesticides - I also know
    39        that the protocols used to detect OPs are faulty in that
    40        the main site used to sample in animal carcasses is kidney
    41        fat.  However, a significant number of OP formulations are
    42        not lipid soluble and do not accumulate in fats, and
    43        specifically not kidney fats which have the lowest turnover
    44        of fats in the mammalian system.
    45
    46        OPs, to my knowledge, have a predilection for accumulating
    47        in nervous tissue- which is to be expected as their
    48        designated mode of action is to attack nervous systems?
    49        A.  I can add here that the molecules were originally
    50        developed as pesticides, and they were found by German 
    51        chemists just prior to the Second World War, and the mode 
    52        of attack was found to be different from those of the 
    53        organochlorines and others from which molecule/molecular
    54        group would develop the nerve gasses such as Sarin, so the
    55        conventional testing which looks for poisons which have a
    56        different mode of attack will not find molecules which are
    57        specifically designed to be attracted to the nervous tissue
    58        and to work therein.  So, it really is quite significant
    59        that the dear old Ministry is undertaking a regime of
    60        pesticide testing looking at kidney fats, which is where

Prev Next Index