Day 242 - 29 Apr 96 - Page 04
1 Q. Right:
2
3 "I have published articles dealing, amongst other things,
4 with deforestation in Costa Rica, in academic books and
5 journals published in the UK and the United States.
6 I understand the relevant issues raised in this case; my
7 research has led me to conclude there is a clear and
8 definite link between the rapid expansion of beef
9 production in Costa Rica during the 1960s and 1970s and the
10 ongoing process of deforestation, and I am prepared so to
11 testify. I cannot comment on the specific involvement of
12 McDonald's without further information". Is that your
13 signature?
14 A. That is my signature. Could I add a very small point
15 of clarification at this stage: There is a time lag
16 between the expansion of beef production and the rate of
17 deforestation, and while the most rapid expansion of beef
18 production was during the 1960s and 1970s, the most rapid
19 rate of deforestation was during the 1970s and 1980s.
20
21 Q. Okay. If we move onto the second statement -- sorry, you
22 verify that statement?
23 A. I do.
24
25 Q. Yes. The second statement:
26
27 "I have now seen documents containing statements by
28 Raymond M. Cesca, David Rose, Luis Jimenez, Juan Sequeira
29 and a representative of the Co-Ope Montecillos of Costa
30 Rica, and on the basis of this evidence, I wish to enter
31 the supplementary statement about the McDonald's case:
32
33 "1. It appears that up to 1988, McDonald's were using beef
34 from land that had been deforested as recently as 10 years
35 before that date;
36
37 "2. This was ecologically irresponsible behaviour, given
38 that the rate of deforestation in Costa Rica during the
39 1960s and 1970s was among the highest in Latin America, and
40 that much of this deforestation was taking place for the
41 purpose of clearing land for pasture;
42
43 "3. Many ecologists, including the undersigned, consider
44 that Costa Rica has been deforested to unacceptable levels
45 in the past 30 years and that all efforts should go into
46 reforesting much of the pasture land that was covered in
47 humid forest before the 1906s;
48
49 "4. If this goal is to be taken seriously, then McDonald's
50 new policy of not purchasing beef from land that was
51 deforested 25 or more years ago is equally inadequate; no
52 beef pastured on land that was deforested during the period
53 of unbridled forest clearance of the 1960s and after should
54 be purchased by responsible companies.
55
56 November 1st, 1993".
57
58 Do you stand by that statement?
59 A. I do.
60