Day 209 - 25 Jan 96 - Page 10


     
     1        could have taken me a while to get round to it.
     2
     3   Q.   I will read it through.  If there is anything that is
     4        incorrect in it, please stop me as I am reading it out.
     5        A.  Right.
     6
     7   Q.   I mean, obviously if it needs clarification, then please
     8        stop me and say so.
     9
    10        "Employment.  Scheduling.  It was common practice for the
    11        schedule to be used as a tool of discipline by senior
    12        management within the store.  For example, I witnessed on
    13        several occasions Managers requesting the scheduling
    14        Manager to reduce the hours or give predominantly unsocial
    15        hours to employees whom they did not consider to perform
    16        well.  These requests were sometimes made in Managers'
    17        meetings called partly to discuss unsatisfactory
    18        employees.
    19
    20        'Hit lists' were sometimes completed of employees that
    21        needed improvement.  This improvement was sought by a
    22        process of retraining which often meant continual
    23        harassment on the job for Managers, as well as incentives
    24        such as less or unsocial hours which would improve as the
    25        employee did so.  This targeting often led to people
    26        resigning partly because of the pressure and partly due to
    27        lack of money resulting from reduced hours.  I believe it
    28        was the general perception that it was easier to make
    29        someone resign rather than sack them, which required poor
    30        performance reviews or several warnings".
    31        A.  Can I come in there?
    32
    33   Q.   "(Extra paperwork)"  yes, please.
    34        A.  What I am saying there is, because it is easier to --
    35        because the place was so disorganised, we used to try to
    36        sack people and certain forms had not been filled in, they
    37        would have missed PRs, so they could not be sacked, so you
    38        would force them to leave.  Just because paperwork was
    39        never up to date and if people's PRs were late, you could
    40        not blame them for not performing well because they had not
    41        been given a performance review on time.
    42
    43        So it was easier to say or try and improve these people,
    44        but in saying you are trying to improve these people what,
    45        in reality, happens is the Managers on the floor downstairs
    46        are told to give this person OCLs.  So you are permanently
    47        critiquing them, so you are permanently telling them what
    48        they are doing wrong, and this can go on all day, plus the
    49        scheduling Manager, you know, is not inclined to give them
    50        social shifts, I would call them.  They are more inclined 
    51        to give them closes just because closes are less popular 
    52        shifts, more difficult to fill. 
    53
    54   Q.   I will continue.
    55        A.  Yes.
    56
    57   Q.   Thank you for that.  "In respect of the schedule, to my
    58        knowledge, there was no system in place in the store for
    59        checking inconsistencies, so Managers had a free rein to do
    60        as they wished".

Prev Next Index