Day 198 - 08 Dec 95 - Page 12


     
     1        tried to use this, and he tried to get her to say in
     2        statements to say that I had done it, when it was obvious
     3        that I had not done it.  He was pressuring people at the
     4        time them to use this as an excuse to get rid of me.
     5
     6   Q.   You knew, did you not, Mr. Coton, that if Sally Spurgeon
     7        turned Queen's evidence, if I may call it that, that you
     8        would get it in the neck because, in fact, you and she had
     9        been doing it all along, had you not?
    10        A.  We had all been doing it all along, which is why we
    11        would actually -- when we were told:  "If you carry on
    12        doing it, you will be disciplined", we stopped.  As soon as
    13        we were threatened with discipline for carrying it on, the
    14        practice was stopped, or it was told to be stopped.  But I
    15        have never ever said that we did not do it before that.  So
    16        I cannot see the point you are making here.  I mean, I have
    17        always admitted, as a store, as a procedure, it was
    18        something that was done through my whole term.
    19
    20   Q.   I promise you, you will see the point that I am making in a
    21        moment, Mr. Coton.  Mr. Skehel was appointed as Supervisor
    22        at the beginning of February 1991, was he not?
    23        A.  I believe so, yes.
    24
    25   Q.   That was to fill the vacancy left by Mr. Mark Davis?
    26        A.  That was correct, yes.
    27
    28   Q.   Who became a Senior Supervisor and left the area?
    29        A.  Correct.
    30
    31   Q.   Did you hope that you would get Mr. Davis' post when he
    32        left?
    33        A.  About six months before he left I hoped, but within the
    34        last six months -- it has already been documented -- I was
    35        not performing as well as I had been, so I knew that it
    36        would not be me that got the position.
    37
    38   Q.   Your last performance review from Mr. Davis which was in
    39        November 1990 was a very bad one, was it not?
    40        A.  It was critical, yes.
    41
    42   Q.   It was said, in effect, apologetically, that it was an
    43        "assassination" -- do you remember that word?
    44        A.  I cannot remember that word.
    45
    46   Q.   We need not look it up.  It is there.  Were you
    47        disappointed that you were not made Supervisor in
    48        Mr. Davis' place?
    49        A.  No, because I knew that I had not performed enough to
    50        get it. 
    51 
    52   Q.   Was it after your letter of resignation that some big wigs 
    53        came down and, as it were, begged you to stay on?
    54        A.  It was after I resigned that I had three visits, I
    55        believe, where I was asked not to leave.
    56
    57   Q.   Asked?
    58        A.  Not to leave.
    59
    60   Q.   Not to leave, yes.  What was their reason for asking you

Prev Next Index