Day 169 - 04 Oct 95 - Page 08


     
     1
     2   Q.   So in the last year you have not dismissed any
     3        non-probationers, are you saying?
     4        A.  Well, I do not understand your question.  Are you
     5        talking to me or just talking as a store, or -----
     6
     7   Q.   In the last year at the store have you dismissed any
     8        non-probationers?
     9        A.  Yes.
    10
    11   Q.   You have?
    12        A.  Yes.
    13
    14   Q.   Right.  So there was half a dozen of them -- that is what
    15        you said yesterday.
    16        A.  No.  The figure goes up and down.  There is about,
    17        I should imagine there is about six or seven probation --
    18        people that have failed their probation review.  I should
    19        also imagine, perhaps, there is more than that, may be six
    20        or eight that have been dismissed for other reasons.  We
    21        dismissed four in one particular incident so .....
    22
    23   Q.   Was that while Mr. Logan was still working at the store?
    24        A.  No, because Mr. Logan finished on 9th November 1994.
    25
    26   Q.   Dismissals do sometimes occur en masse, do they, like four,
    27        rather than just one at a time?
    28        A.  The four people that were dismissed were dismissed for
    29        giving away and receiving stolen property.
    30
    31   Q.   Was that food from the store?
    32        A.  It was food from the store and it was also property
    33        from a crew member within a store.  They had forced his
    34        locker open.
    35
    36   Q.   All four of them?
    37        A.  Two of them forced his locker open and then went
    38        downstairs and carried on working the shift.  It was
    39        discovered that they had forced his locker open.  They
    40        admitted forcing his locker open.  They admitted to forcing
    41        his locker open whilst they were being interviewed about
    42        giving away food to two of their friends.
    43
    44   Q.   So the other two were just done for giving away food?
    45        A.  No.  The two that broke into the locker were dismissed
    46        for -- they were actually dismissed for giving away food,
    47        but whilst they were being interviewed for giving away food
    48        to their two friends who were also dismissed for receiving
    49        stolen food -----
    50 
    51   Q.   So they also worked for McDonald's, the friends they were 
    52        giving the food to? 
    53        A.  That is right.  Whilst they were being interviewed for
    54        that, they admitted breaking into the locker of a crew
    55        member earlier on in the day.  That information was passed
    56        to the Police who acted subsequently.
    57
    58   Q.   The two who were receiving the stolen food, that was all
    59        they were dismissed for?
    60        A.  They were dismissed for receiving stolen food, that is

Prev Next Index