Day 143 - 27 Jun 95 - Page 07


     
     1        A.  No, that is untrue.  That was not a subject of
     2        conversation whatsoever at that time.
     3
     4   Q.   I am going to move on from New Zealand:  You are aware, are
     5        you not -- I presume you are -- of the strike in Dublin in
     6        1979?
     7        A.  What year was that?
     8
     9   Q.   1979.  We have witnesses on both sides on this matter.
    10        A.  It has been sometime.  I am aware of a picketing
    11        situation and a dispute there.  That would probably be
    12        around the right time, yes.
    13
    14   Q.   You are aware that the Labour Board said that workers had a
    15        right to be represented by a union even if they were in a
    16        minority, that those workers themselves could have a right
    17        to elect a representative or have a union official to speak
    18        on their behalf with the Company?
    19        A.  I recall that the franchisee and the union voluntarily
    20        submitted the dispute to a tribunal, equivalent of a labour
    21        court, I believe, and that that was their recommendation,
    22        and that the owner/operator accepted that recommendation.
    23
    24   Q.   Have you been to Ireland?
    25        A.  Yes, I have.
    26
    27   Q.   Did you go to Ireland any time around that dispute?
    28        A.  Yes, I did.
    29
    30   Q.   What time did you go, can you recall?  I think the strike
    31        was from March to September, if I remember, just from
    32        recollection.
    33        A.  The problem was well underway because when I arrived
    34        there were pickets outside of the two restaurants that were
    35        there in Dublin, and had been going on for a while, maybe a
    36        couple of weeks, but do not hold me to that.
    37
    38   Q.   How long were you there for?
    39        A.  I was there about, I would say, about seven or eight
    40        days, maybe a day or more on either end.
    41
    42   Q.   What was the purpose of your visit?
    43        A.  The owner/operator needed to find competent counsel.
    44        I knew nothing about Irish labour laws.  I was not of
    45        tremendous help, and I went searching for labour counsel.
    46        We found Peter Sutherland, a very distinguished barrister,
    47        and I believe he is the same -- he is the same gentleman
    48        who has been responsible for the recent GATT negotiations,
    49        and we secured him to provide the necessary advice to the
    50        owner/operator. 
    51 
    52   Q.   But apart from finding a useful lawyer --- 
    53        A.  Yes.
    54
    55   Q.   -- what else did you do?
    56        A.  I worked with Mr. Sutherland.  He was very interested
    57        in US labour laws.  I think one of the problems that he had
    58        was there was very little precedent or Irish labour law, if
    59        you will, of any significance, and he was trying to work up
    60        his advice and recommendations to the owner/operator.

Prev Next Index