Day 142 - 26 Jun 95 - Page 33


     
     1        sit-down restaurant agreement; no changes, nothing
     2        different.  It refused to take into consideration, for
     3        example, that we had part-time workers that we had
     4        employed.  They wanted us to fire our part-time workers.
     5        That is what they wanted.
     6
     7        Our employees resisted that, told us not to sign the
     8        agreement because they wanted to keep their jobs and the
     9        union did not care about whether or not they kept their
    10        jobs or not.
    11
    12        From there, throughout the 80s, we asked the union -- "we",
    13        the owner/operators; I did not participate in the
    14        negotiations, I do not speak Danish -- the owner/operators
    15        continued to ask the union, to my knowledge, for some
    16        flexibility in what they considered to be a sit-down
    17        restaurant contract.  The union refused any flexibility at
    18        all until, I want to say, the time period that you have
    19        made reference to, in 88/89, they agreed to the part-time
    20        issue, they agreed to other things that our employees, the
    21        owner/operator's employees, and the owner/operators
    22        wanted.  They reached an initial agreement, I believe,
    23        around this date, with the agreement that they would
    24        continue to negotiate to have a full agreement, if you
    25        will.
    26
    27        Then the operators joined with other quick service
    28        companies to form an association, at the agreement of the
    29        union, so that both sides, the union and the
    30        owner/operators, could have a complete agreement that fit
    31        the industry, the quick service restaurant industry.
    32        Burger King, I believe, was part of that.  Whatever other
    33        notable quick service restaurants became part of that
    34        association, negotiations continued some time mid 90s, 92,
    35        93, I cannot be sure.  They reached agreement on the new
    36        association.  They reached agreement on the terms, and
    37        I also believe that just recently they negotiated a
    38        successive agreement to that original one that I think they
    39        had entered into.
    40
    41        That is the history, if you will, as I know it in Denmark.
    42
    43   MR. MORRIS:  As told to you by?
    44        A.  The owner/operators, as told primarily by the
    45        owner/operators.
    46
    47   Q.   So part the union's continuous concern is to force
    48        McDonald's to provide guaranteed hours for employees?
    49        A.  Sir, if you listened to what I said, they did not care
    50        about what the employees wanted or did not want. 
    51 
    52   Q.   I am asking you ----- 
    53        A.  What they wanted was their agreement and no changes
    54        until they put some flexibility in.
    55
    56   Q.   They wanted guaranteed hours for McDonald's employees, did
    57        they not?
    58        A.  I do not know the specific terms.  I will tell you that
    59        the employees of McDonald's petitioned the union to try to
    60        get them to be flexible so they could keep their jobs, that

Prev Next Index