Day 139 - 21 Jun 95 - Page 31


     
     1        occurs.  It has nothing to do with what McDonald's is doing
     2        or is not doing.
     3
     4   Q.   Were not you concerned when you found hundreds of
     5        violations of child labour laws in one particular
     6        franchisee's stores?
     7        A.  We did not find hundreds of violations.  We saw that
     8        his process and his safeguards to ensure that any
     9        violations would not occur were not up to what we would
    10        consider appropriate.  It is incumbent upon our
    11        owner/operators to review what is happening on a constant
    12        basis, not take their eye off the ball, and ensure that
    13        everything is going the way it should go.
    14
    15   Q.   Did you change your inspection systems or procedures or
    16        organisation after this circumstance?
    17        A.  No, we did not.  We provided him with some additional
    18        training that he had previously had.  We provided his
    19        managers with additional training.  We checked out the
    20        systems that should be in place.  We noted where, in fact,
    21        he may not have done everything he should have.  It was a
    22        matter of keeping your eye on the ball.  He had been a fine
    23        operator for many, many years, doing many things extremely
    24        well; and, for one reason or another, he had taken his eye
    25        off the ball; and we were getting his focus back where it
    26        should be.
    27
    28   Q.   If your inspection systems had failed to discover what the
    29        state had discovered, how do you know that he had his eye
    30        on the ball before, previously?
    31        A.  Because the state and the local authorities had been in
    32        there on many, many occasions, and we had been in on other
    33        occasions.  The inspection that took place by the local
    34        authorities was no different than the periodic inspections
    35        that had occurred in prior years.
    36
    37   Q.   Did you send out any memos to other stores about compliance
    38        with child labour laws as a result of this incident?
    39        A.  No, no memos went out.  Our nature is to communicate
    40        verbally, but not send memos.
    41
    42   Q.   Did you communicate verbally to all your 10,000 stores in
    43        America -- or 8,000 it was at that time, or something --
    44        about the need to comply with child labour laws?
    45        A.  On an ongoing basis, we provide training, we provide
    46        communications; and we would have added the McCale
    47        situation to our communications, saying: "This happened
    48        because someone took his eye off the ball.  This is
    49        something that should not happen."
    50 
    51   Q.   When you communicated this to other stores round the 
    52        country, about what had happened at McCale ----- 
    53        A.  Excuse me?  What was the last thing?
    54
    55   Q.   When you communicated what had happened at McCale to
    56        McDonald's stores nationally, what -- can you remember --
    57        did you actually say?
    58        A.  We said that the local authorities had come in, had
    59        found indications that records were not being properly
    60        kept, that the normal safeguards that all of them were

Prev Next Index