Day 108 - 27 Mar 95 - Page 19


     
     1        secretary of the thing which preceded FORTH.  It was called
     2        FAWAC, the Farm Animal Welfare Advisory Council, and we
     3        discussed the matter with them for half an hour or
     4        something and it was just a defensive stance I would say,
     5        although Mr. Jackson was more concerned than Mr. Horman I
     6        remember.
     7
     8   Q.   It has been said in this court that various things would
     9        not be allowed by the Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and
    10        Food and this would be stopped and that would be stopped.
    11        In general, what is your experience of the Ministry and
    12        what action they take with regard to any possible welfare
    13        problems?
    14        A.  We are very concerned by their apparent lack of
    15        concern.  They still have a policy of giving warning when
    16        they are going to visit any farm, but I will say battery
    17        farms for the current case in question.  Two days is
    18        common, which of course gives the farmers plenty of time,
    19        and they certainly would remove any deads and incinerate
    20        them and so on and so forth.   Only last week on this
    21        television programme, a battery in Norwich was featured and
    22        it was one of the worst I have ever seen.  I have not seen
    23        it personally but I have seen the original video taken
    24        there, and I have discussed the case with the vet at
    25        Norwich MAFF.
    26
    27        I was horrified by the fact that she seemed to accept the
    28        fact that these birds which were clearly, they were just
    29        desiccated almost, she did actually argue the fact that it
    30        is not in the law that you remove dead birds from the
    31        cages.  Of course it is in the Codes and we discussed this
    32        fully on the phone.  I could not understand the reasoning
    33        and also we know that they do not know where all the farms
    34        are even, and we have been to places where they have not
    35        been inspected in decades, literally, and did not expect to
    36        be, so the amount of inspections of intensive poultry
    37        units, it is minimal, and prior warning is given when it
    38        does happen.
    39
    40   Q.   Would that apply to the broiler industry as well?
    41        A.  I am sure it does because they are a very
    42        over-stretched service.  They have, I think, about 300
    43        state vetinary offices out in the field and there are,
    44        I think, a quarter of a million farms in this country
    45        holding livestock and of course with things like the BSE
    46        and, yes, particularly BSE, in recent years they have been
    47        over-stretched to a degree.  They just go to a very, very
    48        small percentage of farms.
    49
    50   Q.   Could I just clarify, the MAFF official that you spoke to 
    51        felt that it was acceptable to have dead birds in the 
    52        cages? 
    53        A.  Well, they have described that farm as acceptable, yes
    54        and it was, to my mind, totally unacceptable.
    55
    56   Q.   Was this just one or two birds that were dead in the cages?
    57        A.  No, there were several and the mortality figures which
    58        were revealed in this programme suggested to any normal
    59        person that the deads were taken out twice a week because
    60        the figures were for Tuesdays and Thursdays only, nothing

Prev Next Index