Day 076 - 18 Jan 95 - Page 33
1
2 Q. Am I understanding you correctly, you are not saying that
3 you have kept, as it were, what one might call a military
4 style McDonald's patrol watch for the last two and a half
5 years?
6 A. No.
7
8 Q. It is simply that when you have looked out of the window
9 you have seen some things, as I understand your evidence,
10 but not for the last two and a half years of McDonald's
11 environment/index.html">litter patrol, is that right?
12 A. That is right, yes.
13
14 Q. Can I suggest hat even on your account of matters, and you
15 must understand I do not accept there has been no environment/index.html">litter
16 patrol for the last two and a half years or for any time
17 during the last two and a half years, but can I suggest
18 that even on your account you may have misremembered the
19 dates? Can you look back, please, at Dr. Taylor's letter
20 which is on page 772 of the pink file? You see that letter
21 is dated 28th September 1992, do you?
22 A. That is right.
23
24 Q. Do you see on the following page he says, whether it is
25 right or wrong, that "The clearing of rubbish" around the
26 premises is generally good, as is that in the local
27 streets" in the plural, "through your staff patrol
28 system." Then if you would, please, turn on to page 779,
29 a letter dated almost exactly a year later, Dr. Taylor, the
30 Chairman of the umbrella organisation, writes at the bottom
31 of 779: "The regular McDonald's patrol system has broken
32 down and is now often stimulated by a resident calling on
33 the Kings Road Manager", and so on. How do you react to
34 the suggestion that when you said mid-1992, you might have
35 meant mid-1993 in the light of those documents?
36 A. Well, there is always a delay factor between an actual
37 complaint and our meetings because our meetings take place
38 quarterly. It could easily be that what is written in
39 September 1992 represented a situation three months earlier
40 since our last meeting, but I mean I am not absolutely firm
41 on dates.
42
43 Q. No.
44 A. Whether it is a year and a half or two and a half
45 years.
46
47 Q. Exactly, but for this reason is it quite important perhaps,
48 Mr. McIntyre, that in your written statement you have
49 accused Mr. Siddique who is sitting in front of me here of
50 telling a blatant lie to the relevant planning committee at
51 the Kensington Borough Council about the existence of
52 environment/index.html">litter patrols; and, if it were right that you are mistaken
53 and you have put the matter back in here in your own mind,
54 quite innocently, I am not suggesting you have done it
55 deliberately, then it would not be a fair comment to make
56 about what Mr. Siddique said to the Committee, would it?
57 A. When Mr. Siddique this to the Planning Committee I was
58 well aware that no patrols had come down recently. When
59 was the planning thing?
60