Day 061 - 05 Dec 94 - Page 29
1 Q. But you just do not know?
2 A. No.
3
4 MS. STEEL: You have actually said, well, these countries do
5 not want polystyrene used because it takes up a lot of room
6 in landfill sites and is not biodegradable; you have agreed
7 with that, yes?
8 A. Yes.
9
10 Q. But you have said that in the UK there is no significant
11 landfill problem?
12 A. I do not think so.
13
14 Q. You do not think there is a problem?
15 A. No.
16
17 Q. Right. So are you saying then that as long as there is
18 room in the dumps, there is no problem with dumping lots of
19 McDonald's waste in the ground?
20 A. And everybody else's waste, yes, that is true.
21
22 Q. Right, OK. You do not see any problems with the dumping of
23 waste?
24 A. I can see it to be a benefit, otherwise you will end up
25 with lots of vast, empty gravel pits all over the country.
26
27 Q. So you are asserting it is an environmental benefit to dump
28 waste in landfill sites?
29 A. It could be.
30
31 Q. It could be?
32 A. Yes, it is certainly not a problem.
33
34 Q. OK. Do you know why the German environmental law does not
35 consider incineration to be an acceptable alternative form
36 of waste disposal?
37 A. Well, basically from what I have heard, the
38 incineration systems in Germany and Austria are both very
39 old and antiquated. I think that is their main
40 consideration.
41
42 Q. What, you think they would not be capable of developing a
43 state of the art incineration plant, if that was what they
44 thought was worthwhile?
45 A. They did not feel that they wanted to develop it,
46 clearly.
47
48 Q. Right, or it could be that they consider that incineration
49 poses environmental hazards?
50 A. Well, that is an opinion, I do not know. I have given
51 you my answer.
52
53 Q. Right, and your answer was also an opinion?
54 A. No, that is a fact. Their incineration systems are old
55 and antiquated.
56
57 Q. But do you know that is the reason why that law has been
58 passed?
59 A. That is the reason I am told, yes.
60