Day 056 - 28 Nov 94 - Page 26


     
     1        diversity, is it not?
     2        A.  Not entirely so.
     3
     4   Q.   But in general?
     5        A.  If you would -----
     6
     7   Q.   In general?
     8        A.  In general, one would have to say that a natural forest
     9        has its own biodiversity, but a forest which is
    10        regenerating as either a natural regeneration or as a
    11        plantation has its diversity as well.  It is equally true
    12        to say that a land which was not forested which becomes
    13        forested encourages new wildlife on a broad basis.
    14
    15   Q.   Would you describe the replacement of English ancient
    16        woodlands after the Second World War with coniferous
    17        plantations as good management?
    18        A.  I would have to ask you where any English woodland of
    19        ancient character was removed in order to plant coniferous
    20        forest because, generally speaking, the planting of
    21        coniferous forest has been on land which has been open
    22        space, heathland, hillside, up the hill rather than down in
    23        the lowlands where the ancient woodlands exist.
    24
    25   Q.   Is it a fact that after the Second World War a large
    26        percentage of UK ancient woodlands were felled; is that a
    27        fact?
    28        A.  A great deal of land was cleared for agriculture.
    29
    30   Q.   But just is it a fact that something equivalent to 50 per
    31        cent of UK ancient woodlands have been felled since the
    32        Second World War?
    33        A.  I think it is a fairly broad statement of the factual
    34        position as it was, but that is not directly relevant to
    35        the planting of coniferous trees.
    36
    37   Q.   No, forget coniferous; is it a fact that half of the
    38        ancient woodlands have been felled approximately since the
    39        Second World War in Britain?
    40        A.  As there is no absolute record of all the woodlands
    41        that make up that ancient, it is very difficult to say
    42        whether that is an accurate figure or not.
    43
    44   Q.   But approximately?
    45        A.  I think it would be fair to say that agriculture and
    46        development has been responsible for a considerable loss of
    47        ancient woodlands in England.
    48
    49   Q.   Right, and that the general replanting of woodlands since
    50        the Second World War, the plantations have been coniferous; 
    51        is that correct? 
    52        A.  Not so much replanting if you are talking about the 
    53        ancient woodlands of England.
    54
    55   Q.   Wherever they have been established?
    56        A.  Where new forest has been established.
    57
    58   Q.   It has been coniferous?
    59        A.  A high proportion of it has been coniferous until
    60        recent years.

Prev Next Index