Day 056 - 28 Nov 94 - Page 11
1 before the period of 1988 and 1989 because at that time
2 sustainability was measured in terms of sustained yield.
3 But it is now very much the recognised pattern that forests
4 are managed along the lines of that Helsinki statement.
5
6 Q. So, the position that "sustainability" also refers to
7 ecological sustainability, since when has that been the
8 predominant position as opposed to just merely yield
9 volume?
10 A. Well, that is difficult to answer because it varies
11 from country to country, as I am sure you appreciate.
12
13 Q. In the UK?
14 A. But in the United Kingdom, in 1985, the full extent of
15 change, I think, became apparent when we adopted a
16 programme of multipurpose forest in which definitions of
17 ecological sustainability was included, and since 1985
18 British forestry has been managed taking biodiversity into
19 consideration in very specific terms.
20
21 Q. So, was Britain ahead of other countries in that respect?
22 A. Britain has taken a lead in both the Helsinki meeting
23 and the recent one in India, and has been very much
24 involved with its own representation and government
25 representation in the United Nations conference on economic
26 development that took place in Rio de Janeiro in 1992.
27
28 Q. As far as Europe is concerned, this resolution was passed,
29 was that the first time it had been recognised
30 European-wide?
31 A. In Helsinki?
32
33 Q. In Helsinki, that the sustainability also included
34 ecological?
35 A. Well, that conference followed the 1992 Rio de Janeiro
36 conference. By that time it had very much established the
37 position in relation to the environment on a broad basis,
38 including biodiversity.
39
40 Q. So, it is the 1992 Rio conference then that was the
41 cross-roads, if you like?
42 A. It was the first international statement in which all
43 the countries attending that conference, over 70 of them
44 signed a document of forest principles which included
45 environmental statements, very broad environmental
46 statements.
47
48 Q. I am just trying to get the respective time scales. Do you
49 happen to know the positions on the word "sustainability"
50 in the relevant countries from your report -- let us start
51 with the United States: Do you happen to know when, if you
52 like, the official government and industry position on
53 sustainability was similar to that, became similar to that?
54 A. I think it was very much more specific to given
55 situations of environmental concern. It was never really a
56 federal statement in the early stages; it was individual
57 states that were faced with particular problems of
58 environmental concern, raised either locally or nationally
59 but in concern to a region. Therefore, decisions were
60 being made and judgments being made in the court from about