----------------------------------------------------------------- 04/FEB/96 CBS 60 MINUTES Part I Participants: * Mike Wallace, CBS 60 Minutes correspondent * Dr. Jeffrey S. Wigand, Former B&W executive * Gordon Smith, Brown and Williamson attorney * Mike Moore, Attorney General of Mississippi * Thomas Sandefur, former President/CEO B&W * Merrell Williams, former paralegal for B&W law firm [shown only on camera] * Dr. Stanton Glantz, Professor of Medicine, University of California Medical Center, San Francisco * Kendrick Wells, assistant general counsel, formerly staff attorney, B&W [shown only on camera] * Lucretia Wigand, wife of Dr. Jeffrey Wigand * Two daughters of Dr. & Mrs. Wigand [only seen at distance on camera] [Introduction] Wallace: [voiceover showing footage of Dr. Wigand in "60 Minutes" frame] Which is true? [voiceover showing footage of Gordon Smith in "60 Minutes" frame] What the tobacco men at Brown & Williamson say about their former research director, Dr. Jeffrey Wigand ... Smith: His life has been a pattern of lies. Wallace: [voiceover showing footage of Mike Moore in "60 Minutes" frame]: or what the Attorney-General of Mississippi says about him? Moore: The information that Jeffrey has, I think is the most important information that has ever come out against the tobacco industry. Wallace: [voiceover showing footage of Dr. Wigand in "60 Minutes" frame] Tonight, Jeffrey Wigand, the scientist whose insistence on defying his former employer has led him to tell what he believes to be the truth about cigarettes. What is it that he believes to be the truth about cigarettes? And what is it that Brown & Williamson believes to be the truth about him? [Beginning of segment] Wallace: [in studio] A story we set out to report six months ago has now turned into two stories: how cigarettes can destroy peoples' lives and how one cigarette company is trying to destroy the reputation of a man who refused to keep quiet about what he says he learned when he worked for them. The company is Brown & Williamson, America's third largest tobacco company. [speaking in front of backdrop showing picture of Dr. Wigand surrounded by cigarette packs and title of segment: Jeffrey Wigand Ph.D. Produced by Lowell Bergman]: The man they set out to destroy is Dr. Jeffrey Wigand, their former three-hundred-thousand-dollar-a-year director of research. They employed prestigious law firms to sue him, a high-powered investigation firm to probe every nook and cranny of his life. And they hired a big-time public relations consultant to help them plant damaging stories about him in the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, and others. But the Journal reported the story for what they thought it was: "scant evidence" was just one of their comments. CBS management wouldn't let us broadcast our original story and our interview with Jeffrey Wigand because they were worried about the possibility of a multi-billion dollar lawsuit against us for tortious interference, that is, interfering with Wigand's confidentiality agreement with Brown & Williamson. But now, things have changed. Last week, the Wall Street Journal got hold of and published a confidential deposition Wigand gave in a Mississippi case, a November deposition that repeated many of the charges he made to us last August. And while a lawsuit is still a possibility, not putting Jeffrey Wigand's story on "60 Minutes" no longer is. Scene: Dr. Wigand; video of Brown & Williamson Tower building, Louisville, KY; cigarettes and loose tobacco on conveyer belt; Dr. Wigand; Brown & Williamson Tower building, Louisville, KY; cigarettes in cigarette machine and loose tobacco on conveyer belt; footage of tobacco company executives swearing oath to tell truth before House Subcommittee on Health & Environment, April 1994 Wallace: What Dr. Wigand told us in that original interview was that his former colleagues, executives of Brown & Williamson Tobacco, knew all along that their tobacco products, their cigarettes and pipe tobacco, contained additives that increased the danger of disease. And further, that they had long known that the nicotine in tobacco is an addictive drug, despite their public statements to the contrary, like the testimony before Congress of Dr. Wigand's former boss, B&W's Chief Executive Officer Thomas Sandefur. Sandefur: [testifying before House Subcommittee on Health & Environment, April 1994] I believe that nicotine is not addictive. Wigand: [in office interview with Wallace] I believe he perjured himself because I watched those testimonies very carefully. Wallace: All of us did. There was the whole line of people, the whole line of CEOs up there all swearing that ... Wigand: [in office interview with Wallace] Part of the reason I'm here is I felt that their representation clearly, at least within Brown & Williamson's representation, clearly misstated what they commonly knew as language within the company. That we're a nicotine delivery business. Wallace: And that's what cigarettes are for? Wigand: Most certainly. It's a delivery device for nicotine. Wallace: A delivery device for nicotine? Put it in your mouth, light it up, and you're gonna get your fix? Wigand: You'll get your fix. Wallace: [in CBS office] Dr. Wigand says that Brown & Williamson manipulates and adjusts that nicotine fix, not by artificially adding nicotine, but by enhancing the effect of the nicotine through reuse of chemical additives like ammonia, whose process is known in the tobacco industry as "impact boosting." Wigand: While not spiking nicotine. They clearly manipulate it. Wallace: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- | | | B&W | | BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION: | | ROOT TECHNOLOGY: A HANDBOOK | | FOR LEAF BLENDERS | | AND PRODUCT DEVELOPERS | | | -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- The process is described in Brown & Williamson's leaf blender's manual and in other B&W documents. Wigand: There's extensive use of this technology which is called ammonia chemistry that allows for nicotine to be more rapidly absorbed in the lung and therefore affect the brain and central nervous system. Scene: file drawer full of numbered folders; computer screen showing Brown & Williamson documents on World Wide Web; Merrell Williams walking down street; Dr. Stanton Glantz in his office; JAMA July 19, 1995 issue on Dr. Glantz's desk Wallace: And then there are these documents, thousands of pages of confidential scientific reports and legal memoranda from B&W's secret files, which experts say support Dr. Wigand's claim that Brown & Williamson's executives had had strong reason to believe all along that nicotine is addictive and that their tobacco products cause cancer and other diseases. Most of these documents had been locked away in B&W's lawyers' confidential files in Louisville, Kentucky until this man, the paralegal in that law office, Merrell Williams, walked off with them. The documents found their way to Dr. Stanton Glantz, a professor of medicine at the University of California Medical Center in San Francisco. It was Dr. Glantz and a team of scientists from the university who wrote about the documents this past summer in a series of articles in the Journal of the American Medical Association. Wallace: [to Glantz in Dr. Glantz's office] What is the story that the documents told you? Glantz: They told me that thirty years ago, Brown & Williamson and British American Tobacco, its parent, knew nicotine was an addictive drug and they knew smoking caused cancer and other diseases. Wallace: [voiceover video showing Dr. Glantz looking through some documents] And Dr. Glantz says these documents reveal how Brown & Williamson was keeping that knowledge from the public. Glantz: And they also developed very sophisticated legal strategies to keep this information away from the public, to keep this information away from public health authorities. Wallace: Dr. Wigand said that a cigarette is basically a nicotine delivery instrument. That's what it's really all about. Glantz: Yes, absolutely. And in the documents they say that over and over and over again. Wallace: [voiceover footage of smokers smoking cigarettes] And finding a way to deliver that nicotine to the smoker's brain without exposing smokers to disease-causing pollutants like tar that come with tobacco smoke is one reason, says Dr. Wigand, that he was hired by B&W on January 1st, 1989. Wigand: [in office interview with Wallace] They were looking to reduce the hazards within cigarettes, reduce the carcinogenic components or the list of the carcinogens that were within the tobacco products. Wallace: They talked about carcinogens too? Wigand: They talked about carcinogens. Wallace: They talked about cancer and heart disease and emphysema and all of those things and they were going to work toward making a safer cigarette? You must have been very excited. Wigand: I was enthusiastic and energetic in terms of pursuing that. Wallace: [voiceover video showing Dr. Wigand perusing books on shelves at home] Dr. Jeffrey Wigand, with a doctorate in biochemistry, had spent nearly twenty years of working in the health-care and biotechnology industries. He says his goal at B&W was to make a cigarette that would be less likely to cause disease. Wigand: [in office interview with Wallace] People will continue to smoke no matter what, no matter what kind of regulations. If you can provide for those who are smoking, who need to smoke, something that produces less risk for them. I thought I was going to be making a difference. Wallace: [voiceover] Brown & Williamson made Jeff Wigand Vice-President for R&D, paying him more than three hundred thousand dollars a year in salary and perks. Wigand: [in office interview with Wallace] And I was very inquisitive when I came on. Have you ever done any nicotine studies? Have you done any pharmacology studies? Have you done any biological studies? Have you looked at the effect of nicotine on the central nervous system? And always, generally categorically "No, we don't do that kind of work." Wallace: [voiceover showing Brown & Williamson Tower, Louisville, KY] But according to thousands of pages, from B&W and its parent British American Tobacco's confidential files, the company had, in fact, done exactly those kinds of studies. [voiceover showing Dr. Wigand at computer] Dr. Wigand says he did not suspect there was anything wrong until he attended a meeting of scientists who worked for British American Tobacco companies from around the world. Dr. Wigand says that his colleagues talked about working together to develop a safer, a less hazardous cigarette, a cigarette less likely to cause disease. But when it came time to write up their ideas, to create a documentary record of their discussion, B&W's lawyers intervened. Wigand: [in office interview with Wallace] The minutes that came in, they were roughly about eighteen pages long. I knew what was in the content. They were rewritten by Kendrick Wells. They were ... Wallace: Who is he? Wigand: Kendrick Wells was one of the staff attorneys at B&W. Wallace: And he rewrote the minutes of the meeting? Wigand: He rewrote the minutes of the meeting. He edited out the discussions on uh safer cigarette and basically toned the meeting down ... Wallace: You're saying that one of the staff attorneys for B&W here in the United States whose name was ... Wigand: Kendrick Wells. Wallace: An attorney, rewrote the minutes of this research meeting with all of the research heads of BAT Industries? Wigand: That's correct. Wallace: in order to sanitize it, in effect? Wigand: Sanitize it as well as reduce any type of exposure associated with discussing a safer cigarette. When you say you're going to have a safer cigarette, that now takes everything else that you have available and say it is unsafe. And that, from a product liability point of view, gave the lawyers great concern. Wallace: [voiceover footage showing Kendrick Wells walking down street] Kendrick Wells, the lawyer Dr. Wigand says deleted materials from the minutes of the scientific meeting is now the assistant general counsel of B&W. Why would B&W lawyers like Kendrick Wells be so concerned? According to B&W's own confidential files, any evidence, any documents that show any B&W tobacco products like Kools or Viceroys might be unsafe, those documents would have to be produced in court as part of any lawsuit filed by a smoker or his surviving family. And according to the lawyers, those documents could be disastrous for B&W. [to Wigand in office interview] For the lawyers to hold ... Wigand: The lawyers intervene and then they purge documents. And every time there was a reference to the word "less hazardous" or "safer." Wallace: [voiceover showing Dr. Wigand sitting at his desk] But Dr. Wigand says the lawyers' interference, their editing and review of his reports, did not stop him. Wigand: I started asking more probing questions and I started digging deeper and deeper. As I dug deeper and deeper, I started getting a bodyguard. Wallace: What do you mean, bodyguard? Wigand: I went to a meeting. I now was now accompanied by a lawyer. My bodyguard was Kendrick Wells. Wallace: [voiceover showing Dr. Wigand sitting at his desk; photo of Thomas Sandefur holding hand on forehead] Frustrated by the lawyer's intervention and presence at major scientific meetings, Dr. Wigand says he took his complaints to Thomas Sandefur, then the president of B&W. Wallace: [to Wigand] What did he say to you? Wigand: I don't want to hear any more discussion about a safer cigarette. Wallace: [voiceover photo of Thomas Sandefur at hearing table with outstretched arm] And he says Thomas Sandefur went on to tell him ... Wigand: "We pursue a safer cigarette, it would put us under extreme exposure with every other product. I don't want to hear about it anymore." Wallace: All the people who were dying from cigarettes? Wigand: Essentially, yes. Wallace: Cancer? Wigand: Cancer. Wallace: Heart disease, things of that nature? Wigand: Emphysema. Wallace: [voiceover showing a smiling Thomas Sandefur at hearing, April 1994] Lawyers representing B&W and Thomas Sandefur have said that all this as well as other accounts of conversations with Thomas Sandefur are absolutely false. [voiceover showing Dr. Wigand in office interview with Wallace] We asked Dr. Wigand what his reaction was to what he says was Sandefur's decision to abandon the safer cigarette. Wigand: I said I got angry. Wallace: He was your boss. Wigand: I bit my tongue. I had just transitioned from another, one company to another. Uh, I was paid well and was comfortable. And for me to do any precipitous would put my family at risk. Wallace: You were happy to take down the three hundred thousand bucks a year? Wigand: I essentially, yeah, took the money. I did my job. Wallace: [in his own CBS office] So Dr. Wigand abandoned his idea of trying to develop a new and safer cigarette. He turned his attention to investigating the additives, the flavorings, the other compounds in B&W tobacco products. Many, like glycerol, which is used to keep the tobacco in cigarettes moist, are normally harmless. But when glycerol is burned in a cigarette, its chemistry changes. Wigand: [in office interview with Wallace] Glycerol, when it's burnt, forms a, a very specific substance called acrolein. Wallace: According to the American Council on Science and Health, -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- | | | "Acrolein is extremely irritating | | and has been shown to interfere | | with the normal clearing of the | | lungs. Recent research shows | | that acrolein acts like a carcinogen, | | though not yet classified as such..." | | | -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- "acrolein, or 'acroli-en' is extremely irritating and has been shown to interfere with the normal clearing of the lungs. Recent research shows that acrolein acts like a carcinogen, though not yet classified as such." [voiceover footage showing young people smoking] And Dr. Wigand says that B&W continues to add glycerol to their products. But it was another additive that Dr. Wigand says led to the end of his career at B&W. Wigand: [in office interview with Wallace] The straw that broke the camel's back for me and really put me in trouble with Sandefur was a compound called coumarin. Wallace: [voiceover video showing young woman smoking; documents on which clearly written "% COUMARIN"] Coumarin is a flavoring that provides a sweet taste to tobacco products but is known to cause tumors in the livers of mice. It was removed from B&W cigarettes, but according to these documents, B&W continued to use it in its Sir Walter Raleigh aromatic pipe tobacco until at least 1992. Wigand: [in office interview with Wallace] And when I came on board B&W, they had tried to tran, transition from coumarin to another similar flavor that would give the same taste. And it was unsuccessful. Wallace: [voiceover] Dr. Wigand says the news about coumarin and cancer got worse. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- | | | "TOXICOLOGY AND CARCINOGENESIS: | | STUDIES OF COUMARIN | | (CAS NO. 91-64-6) | | IN F344/N RATS AND B63CF 1 | | MICE (GAVAGE STUDIES) | | | -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- This report, by independent researchers, part of a national toxic safety program, presented evidence that coumarin is a carcinogen that causes various cancers. Wigand: [in office interview with Wallace] I wanted it out immediately. And I was told that it would affect sales and I was to mind my own business. And then I constructed a memo to Mr. Sandefur indicating that I could not in conscience continue with coumarin in a product that we now know, have documentation that is lung-specific carcinogen. Wallace: Really? You sent the document forward to Sandefur? Wigand: I sent the document forward to Sandefur. I was told that we would continue working on a substitute and we weren't going to remove it because it would impact sales and that, that was his decision. Wallace: In other words, what you're charging Sandefur with and Brown & Williamson with is ignoring health considerations consciously? Wigand: Most certainly. Wallace: [voiceover video showing Dr. Wigand at his office desk] After his confrontations over coumarin, Dr. Wigand says he was not surprised when on March the 24th, 1993, Thomas Sandefur, newly promoted to Chief Executive Officer, CEO of B&W, had him fired. [to Wigand in office interview] And the reason for firing that he gave you? Wigand: Uh, Poor communication skills, uh, just not cuttin' it, poor performance. Wallace: [voiceover video showing Dr. Wigand, his wife and two daughters saying grace before meal at home] When Dr. Wigand, who has a wife and two young daughters, was fired by Brown & Williamson Tobacco, his contract provided severance pay and critical health benefits for his family, critical because one of his children requires expensive daily health-care. [voiceover showing video of Mrs. Wigand serving dinner] Several months after he was fired, B&W decided to sue their former head of R&D and they cut off his severance and those vital health benefits. Wigand: [in office interview with Wallace] They said I violated my confidentiality agreement by discussing my severance package. Wallace: [voiceover video showing Jeffrey and Lucretia Wigand walking together] Lucretia Wigand says that the firing and B&W's suspension of benefits was devastating. Lucretia Wigand: [in office interview with Wallace] We almost lost our family as a unit. Jeff and I almost separated. Wallace: Why? Lucretia Wigand: Because he was under so much stress and so much pressure that it was something we needed help dealing with. We went to counseling and we worked through it. Wallace: And this was, you think, started, triggered by the business with B&W. Lucretia Wigand: Yes, I know it was. Wallace: [voiceover video showing Jeffrey and Lucretia Wigand at home in kitchen; "Dear Jeff" confidentiality agreement] B&W settled that lawsuit we mentioned and reinstated those critical health benefits, only after Dr. Wigand agreed to sign a new, stricter, lifelong confidentiality agreement. [in CBS office] Nonetheless, word of Dr. Wigand's battles with Brown & Williamson attracted attention in Washington, where in the Spring of 1994, a Democratic Congress and the FDA, the Food and Drug Administration, were investigating the tobacco industry. Dr. Wigand was contacted by their investigators. And after notifying Brown & Williamson, he talked with those investigators. Shortly afterwards, he was stunned by a couple of anonymous telephone calls. Wigand: [in office interview with Wallace] In April 1994, on two separate occasions, I had life threats on my kids. Wallace: What? Wigand: We had life threats on my kids. Wallace: [showing Dr. Wigand referring to his diary] Dr. Wigand told us he doesn't know where they came from, but that, understandably, they frightened him. He described the threats by referring to his diary. Wigand: [reading from his diary] A male voice that was on the phone that said: "Don't mess with tobacco anymore. How are your kids?" And then on April 28th, around 3 o'clock in the afternoon, relatively the same voice, says: "Leave tobacco alone or else you'll find your kids hurt. They're pretty girls now." So I got scared. I started carrying a gun. Wallace: Really? Wigand: Yeah, started carrying a handgun. Lucretia Wigand: [in office interview with Wallace] Someone called and threatened to, to kill him and to hurt the family if he messed with the tobacco industry. Wallace: [in studio with segment backdrop depicting Dr. Wigand] That was last August. Now, in February, Lucretia Wigand has filed for divorce, citing spousal abuse, just one of the accusations Brown & Williamson is using in their full-throated campaign to discredit Jeffrey Wigand. That report when we return. ----------------------------------------------------------------- 04/FEB/96 CBS 60 MINUTES Part II Participants: * Mike Wallace, CBS 60 Minutes correspondent * Dr. Jeffrey S. Wigand, Former B&W executive * Mike Moore, Attorney General of Mississippi * John Scanlon, Media Consultant * Gordon Smith, Brown and Williamson attorney * Hubert Humphrey III, Minnesota Attorney General * Bob Butterworth, Attorney General of Florida Wallace: [in studio] Today, three years after he was fired by Brown and Williamson, Dr. Jeffrey Wigand is the star witness in a U.S. Justice Department criminal investigation into the tobacco industry, which includes the question of whether B&W's former CEO lied to the U.S. Congress when he said that he believed that nicotine was not addictive. But Dr. Wigand is paying a heavy price for his decision to testify as well as for breaking his confidentiality agreement by talking to us. His family life has been shattered. His reputation has been tarnished because of B&W's massive campaign designed to silence him and to discredit this former research chief turned whistle-blower. [to Wigand] They're trying to do what they can to paint you as irresponsible, a liar. Wigand: Well, I think the word they've used Mike is, "The Master of Deceit." Wallace: You wish you hadn't come forward? You wish you hadn't blown the whistle? Wigand: [hesitating] There are times I wish I hadn't done it. But there are times that I feel compelled to do it. Uh, if, if you asked me if I would do it again or if it, do I think it's worth it. Yeah. I think it's worth it. Uh, I think in the end people will see the truth. Wallace: [in studio] Well these three men have seen the same truth as Wigand. They are the state Attorneys' General of Florida, Minnesota and Mississippi where Dr. Wigand is testifying in a multi-billion dollar lawsuit against the tobacco industry. Mike Moore is Attorney General of Mississippi. Moore: Uh, Jeffrey's testimony is gonna be devastating, Mike, to the tobacco industry. Uh, so devastating that I fear for his life. Uh, I think, uh ... Wallace: You serious? Moore: I'm, I'm very serious. Uh, the information that Jeffrey has, I think, is the most important information that has ever come out against the tobacco industry. Uh, this industry, in my opinion, is an industry who has perpetrated the biggest fraud on the American public in history. Uh, they have lied to the American public for years and years. They have killed millions and millions of people and made a profit on it. So, uh, I hope that they won't continue to lie and try to destroy Jeffrey like they destroyed the other lives of people all over this country. Wallace: [in studio] The campaign to destroy Dr. Jeffrey Wigand began over two months ago in the midst of a media frenzy over our failure to broadcast our August interview with him. Brown and Williamson sued Dr. Wigand for talking to us despite his confidentiality agreement and they got a court order in Kentucky to try to silence him from speaking out further. [against scene of wall with sign, "The Investigative Group, Inc."] Then investigators hired by B&W fanned out across the country looking for anything they could use to discredit the whistle-blower. Wigand: They been going around to my family, my friends, digging up and digging here and digging there. Wallace: [in studio] Then their lawyers, and B&W has a half dozen major firms working on the Jeff Wigand case. Their lawyers compiled the results of their nationwide dragnet into a summary that alleges that in recent years Dr. Wigand plead guilty to everything from wife-beating to shoplifting. Beyond that they charged him with a multitude of sins from fudging his resume to making a false claim three years ago for ninety-five dollars and twenty cents for dry cleaning. [against scene of John Scanlon walking down a New York street] Then Brown and Williamson retained John Scanlon to get their story to the media. Scanlon is a fixture of the New York media scene who has close personal relationships with print and television reporters and producers as well as editors and publishers. We asked him to sit down and discuss the charges he has been circulating to me and other reporters but he declined. But Scanlon did make this statement to a CBS News camera crew. Scanlon: He's running ... from cross-examination. His victims have decided to respond and present evidence that he's, in fact, a habitual liar. Wigand: [in studio interview] The smear campaign that's been very systematic, very organized, very well-done. [in classroom to students] My background is, I have a PH.D. in biochemistry. Wallace: [in studio] Today Dr. Wigand is a 30,000 dollar a year science teacher at a Louisville Kentucky public high school. And his students, his faculty colleagues, and his family were stunned last month when a Louisville television station broadcast some of Brown and Williamson's accusations. Local News Anchor: [broadcasting local news] Court records show Wigand was charged with theft by unlawful taking and shoplifting. Wallace: [in studio] Then the Brown and Williamson 500-page dossier on Wigand was given to the Wall Street Journal, who investigated the charges. And last Thursday in this front page story, the journal reported, quote, -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- | | | "A close look at the file and independent | | research by this newspaper into its key | | claims indicates that many of the serious | | allegations against Dr. Wigand are backed | | by scanty or contradictory evidence." | | | -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- A close look at the file and independent research by this newspaper into its key claims indicates that many of the serious allegations against Dr. Wigand are backed by scanty or contradictory evidence. And they continued, quote, -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- | | | "Some of the charges, including that | | he pleaded guilty to shoplifting | | are demonstrably untrue." | | | -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Some of the charges, including that he pleaded guilty to shoplifting are demonstrably untrue. We put that Journal statement to Gordon Smith, an attorney designated by Brown and Williamson to talk to us. [to Gordon Smith] The Wall Street Journal went through all of that material. It says that, what the dossier that you put together, scant evidence ... Smith: Mr. Wallace, that is dead wrong. There's not scant evidence. The Wall Street Journal did not, did not go over the scores, literally scores of untruths told by Jeffrey Wigand that we showed to them. Wallace: [voiceover] And Gordon Smith went on at some length to say that Wigand's life quote, is a pattern of lies. [to Smith] I don't understand, frankly, Mr. Smith. I really don't understand. Brown and Williamson must be in a panic if they're going after this man as hard as you are. Smith: You're wrong. There are no material inaccuracies in that book. None whatsoever. Wallace: [voiceover] But not included in that dossier were Brown and Williamson's own personnel records which showed that Wigand had received good performance appraisals for the first three years from B&W. In his fourth year, however, those appraisals turned sour. But despite that, even after he was fired he received this letter from Brown and Williamson's personnel director. [reading letter to Smith] To whom it may concern. Dr. Jeffrey Wigand was instrumental in the development of new products as well as the major impetus behind a significant upgrade in our R&D technical capabilities both in terms of people and equipment. During his tenure at Brown and Williamson, Dr. Wigand demonstrated a high level of technical knowledge and expertise. [Referring to stationary on Smith's desk] At this is on your own stationary. Your own man saying that about him. Smith: Mike, Brown and Williamson refused to be a reference for Jeff Wigand after he left. This letter was negotiated with his attorney and it was the only statement Brown and Williamson would ever make about him because Brown and Williamson did not want to be a reference for Jeff Wigand. Wallace: [voiceover] And Mr. Smith had this to say about our relationship with Jeffrey Wigand. Smith: You're being led along by a guy who's not believable. You're getting half the story. You, you, and you've got, you've got a, a vested interest in making this man credible. Wallace: Why do we have a ... Smith: CBS has an interest, paid this guy twelve thousand dollars. Wallace: For what? Smith: I believe for consulting. Wallace: Now, wait just a moment. Let's get this straight. Paid him twelve thousand dollars for what? Smith: To consult on a story on CBS. Wallace: [in studio] For the record, as we explained to Mr. Smith, 60 Minutes did, in fact, hire Dr. Wigand two years ago to act as our expert consultant to analyze nearly a thousand pages of technical documents leaked to us not from Brown and Williamson but from inside Philip Morris - another tobacco company. At that time Dr. Wigand told us he would not talk with us about Brown and Williamson and he did not until over a year later. Wigand: I felt an obligation to tell the truth. Uh, there were things I saw. There were things I learned. There were things I observed that I felt that needed to be told. The focus continues to be on what I would call systematic and aggressive tactics to undermine my credibility and my, some of my personal life. Uh ... Wallace: But you expected that, didn't you? Wigand: Well, I didn't expect, to the extent that it's happened, okay? Its, its disrupted not only my life. Uh, I'm in divorce proceedings now. Wallace: [voiceover in studio with three Attorneys General] These three state Attorneys General say that no matter B&W accusations are, they remain convinced that what Wigand has to say about the tobacco industry in general and Brown and Williamson in particular is thoroughly credible. They are suing the tobacco industry for the billions of dollars in state Medicaid costs their states have paid to treat people who have become ill from smoking. Minnesota Attorney General Hubert Humphrey the third. Humphrey: We want to see the full truth come out. We want the deception, fraud and the violations of our state laws stopped. And we want people that are making the money on this product to bear the full cost of the health care uh, burden that is there. Wallace: [voiceover] Bob Butterworth is the Attorney General of Florida. Butterworth: The issue has been deceit. Wallace: Deceit? Butterworth: Pure and simply - deceit. The cigarette companies made a decision that they would withhold valuable information from the American public, information that